A dual-task investigation of automaticity in visual word processing
- PMID: 10946719
A dual-task investigation of automaticity in visual word processing
Abstract
An analysis of activation models of visual word processing suggests that frequency-sensitive forms of lexical processing should proceed normally while unattended. This hypothesis was tested by having participants perform a speeded pitch discrimination task followed by lexical decisions or word naming. As the stimulus onset asynchrony between the tasks was reduced, lexical-decision and naming latencies increased dramatically. Word-frequency effects were additive with the increase, indicating that frequency-sensitive processing was subject to postponement while attention was devoted to the other task. Either (a) the same neural hardware shares responsibility for lexical processing and central stages of choice reaction time task processing and cannot perform both computations simultaneously, or (b) lexical processing is blocked in order to optimize performance on the pitch discrimination task. Either way, word processing is not as automatic as activation models suggest.
Similar articles
-
Is lexical access autonomous? Evidence from combining overlapping tasks with recording event-related brain potentials.Brain Res. 2008 Jul 30;1222:156-65. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.05.066. Epub 2008 Jun 5. Brain Res. 2008. PMID: 18585684
-
Visual word recognition without central attention: evidence for greater automaticity with advancing age.Psychol Aging. 2006 Sep;21(3):431-47. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.21.3.431. Psychol Aging. 2006. PMID: 16953708
-
Age of acquisition and word frequency effects in picture naming: a dual-task investigation.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Mar;34(2):282-301. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.2.282. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008. PMID: 18315406
-
On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect.Psychol Rev. 1990 Jul;97(3):332-61. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.97.3.332. Psychol Rev. 1990. PMID: 2200075 Review.
-
Visual word recognition: Attention, intention, context, and processing dynamics.Can J Exp Psychol. 2022 Mar;76(1):57-74. doi: 10.1037/cep0000274. Can J Exp Psychol. 2022. PMID: 35254838 Review.
Cited by
-
Semantic picture-word interference is a postperceptual effect.Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Apr;19(2):301-8. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0190-x. Psychon Bull Rev. 2012. PMID: 22215465
-
Exploring the mental number line: evidence from a dual-task paradigm.Psychol Res. 2007 Sep;71(5):598-613. doi: 10.1007/s00426-006-0070-6. Epub 2006 Jun 20. Psychol Res. 2007. PMID: 16786352
-
Resolving semantic interference during word production requires central attention.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Nov;39(6):1860-77. doi: 10.1037/a0033095. Epub 2013 Jun 17. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013. PMID: 23773184 Free PMC article.
-
The myth of ballistic processing: evidence from Stroop's paradigm.Psychon Bull Rev. 2001 Jun;8(2):324-30. doi: 10.3758/bf03196168. Psychon Bull Rev. 2001. PMID: 11495121
-
Divided attention modulates semantic activation: evidence from a nonletter-level prime task.Mem Cognit. 2007 Dec;35(8):2001-11. doi: 10.3758/bf03192932. Mem Cognit. 2007. PMID: 18265615
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials