Attention and luminance detection: effects of cues, masks, and pedestals
- PMID: 10946722
- DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.26.4.1401
Attention and luminance detection: effects of cues, masks, and pedestals
Abstract
Three experiments investigated the effects of attention on the detection of luminance targets in a spatial-cuing paradigm. Gabor patch stimuli of 30, 60, or 90 ms duration, equated for detectability, were presented (a) against a uniform field with a checkerboard backward mask, (b) atop a 15% luminance pedestal with a backward mask, or (c) atop a luminance pedestal with no backward mask. Signal detection analysis showed that detection sensitivity was significantly enhanced at attended locations for all observers when backward masks were used, both when targets were presented against a uniform field and when a pedestal was used. However, when no masks were used there was no cuing advantage of any kind. The results show that the cuing effect in simple detection depends on the use of backward masks, a finding that resolves the inconsistencies previously associated with studies of this type.
Similar articles
-
Mask-dependent attentional cuing effects in visual signal detection: the psychometric function for contrast.Percept Psychophys. 2004 Aug;66(6):1056-75. doi: 10.3758/bf03194995. Percept Psychophys. 2004. PMID: 15675651
-
Attentional mechanisms in simple visual detection: a speed-accuracy trade-off analysis.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Oct;35(5):1329-45. doi: 10.1037/a0014255. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009. PMID: 19803640
-
Attention orienting and the time course of perceptual decisions: response time distributions with masked and unmasked displays.Vision Res. 2004 Jun;44(12):1297-320. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.01.002. Vision Res. 2004. PMID: 15066392
-
Color-luminance interaction: data produced by oblique cross masking.J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 1998 Jul;15(7):1756-66. doi: 10.1364/josaa.15.001756. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 1998. PMID: 9656476
-
An integrated theory of attention and decision making in visual signal detection.Psychol Rev. 2009 Apr;116(2):283-317. doi: 10.1037/a0015156. Psychol Rev. 2009. PMID: 19348543 Review.
Cited by
-
Information processing bottlenecks in macaque posterior parietal cortex: an attentional blink?Exp Brain Res. 2013 Jul;228(3):365-76. doi: 10.1007/s00221-013-3569-2. Epub 2013 May 29. Exp Brain Res. 2013. PMID: 23715717
-
Endogenous cueing effects for detection can be accounted for by a decision model of selective attention.Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Apr;27(2):315-321. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01698-3. Psychon Bull Rev. 2020. PMID: 31907851 Free PMC article.
-
Combining spatial and temporal expectations to improve visual perception.J Vis. 2014 Apr 10;14(4):8. doi: 10.1167/14.4.8. J Vis. 2014. PMID: 24722562 Free PMC article.
-
Indexing the graded allocation of visuospatial attention using anticipatory alpha oscillations.J Neurophysiol. 2011 Mar;105(3):1318-26. doi: 10.1152/jn.00653.2010. Epub 2011 Jan 12. J Neurophysiol. 2011. PMID: 21228304 Free PMC article.
-
Transient attention does increase perceived contrast of suprathreshold stimuli: a reply to Prinzmetal, Long, and Leonhardt (2008).Percept Psychophys. 2008 Oct;70(7):1151-64. doi: 10.3758/pp.70.7.1151. Percept Psychophys. 2008. PMID: 18979688 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources