Changes in left ventricular function and mass during serial investigations after valve replacement for aortic stenosis
- PMID: 10947054
Changes in left ventricular function and mass during serial investigations after valve replacement for aortic stenosis
Abstract
Background and aim of the study: The potential for left ventricular hypertrophy regression and associated functional improvements may well be the underlying mechanism of results in general after valve replacement for aortic stenosis. The study aim was to investigate preoperative predictors and the time course of such ventricular changes.
Methods: Forty-six patients (mean age 61 years; range: 24-82 years) with aortic stenosis were prospectively followed with serial investigations (Doppler echocardiography, radionuclide ventriculography) at eight days (n = 43), three months (n = 42) and 18 months (n = 39) after valve replacement with a mechanical valve (19-29 mm). The postoperative course of left ventricular ejection fraction (EF), fast filling fraction, mass index and end-diastolic volume index (EDVi) was analyzed in an independent increments statistical model for repeated measurements.
Results: EF rose marginally, from 59+/-15% preoperatively to 64+/-16% (p <0.05) at 18 months, independently related to preoperative EF (p = 0.0001) and fast filling fraction (p = 0.0001). Changes in fast filling fraction were similarly predicted by the preoperative starting point (p = 0.003) and by preoperative left ventricular systolic radius:wall thickness ratio (p = 0.0002) with an inverse relation (the larger the chamber and the poorer its contractility, the lower the postoperative fast filling fraction). Mass index was independently related to the time point of postoperative measurement, indicating continuing regression of hypertrophy, from 200+/-66 g/m2 preoperatively to 148+/-49 g/m2 at 18 months (p <0.0001), when only 18% of the patients had normal mass index. Mass index was also independently related to preoperative left ventricular end-systolic dimension index (p = 0.0008) with a constant influence, and systolic wall stress (p = 0.0009) which was modified by time: the influence of wall stress was significant at eight days, weak at three months, and pronounced at 18 months. Left ventricular EDVi after surgery was inversely related to preoperative EF modified by time. Associated coronary artery disease, size of the prosthetic valve, and peak gradient across the valve (mean 15 mmHg; range: 7-26 mmHg at 18 months) did not influence any of the four target variables.
Conclusion: We conclude that left ventricular response to valve replacement for aortic stenosis is predictable. A significant reduction in hypertrophy occurs during the first 18 postoperative months, but to a normal ventricular mass in only a minority of patients. Insufficient regression of hypertrophy was related to indices of irreversible myocardial disease, which also prevented functional ventricular improvement despite successful valve replacement and a hemodynamically well functioning valve.
Similar articles
-
Impact of postoperative blood pressure control on regression of left ventricular mass following valve replacement for aortic stenosis.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005 Jun;27(6):994-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2005.02.034. Epub 2005 Apr 7. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005. PMID: 15896607
-
Evaluation of left ventricular function and mass after Medtronic Freestyle versus homograft aortic root replacement using cardiovascular magnetic resonance.J Heart Valve Dis. 2002 Jan;11(1):60-5; discussion 66. J Heart Valve Dis. 2002. PMID: 11843507
-
Indexed effective orifice area after mechanical aortic valve replacement does not affect left ventricular mass regression in elderly.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006 Feb;29(2):139-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2005.11.007. Epub 2006 Jan 11. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006. PMID: 16376565
-
Continuing dilemmas concerning aortic valve replacement in patients with advanced left ventricular systolic dysfunction.J Heart Valve Dis. 1997 Nov;6(6):562-79. J Heart Valve Dis. 1997. PMID: 9427121 Review.
-
[Exercise capacity after heart valve replacement].Z Kardiol. 1994;83 Suppl 3:111-20. Z Kardiol. 1994. PMID: 7941657 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Valve disease: Surgery of valve disease: late results and late complications.Heart. 2001 Dec;86(6):715-21. doi: 10.1136/heart.86.6.715. Heart. 2001. PMID: 11711480 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
Perioperative management of patients with prosthetic heart valves-A narrative review.Ann Card Anaesth. 2022 Jul-Sep;25(3):254-263. doi: 10.4103/aca.aca_109_21. Ann Card Anaesth. 2022. PMID: 35799551 Free PMC article. Review.
-
One problem two issues! Left ventricular systolic and diastolic dysfunction in aortic stenosis.Ann Transl Med. 2014 Jan;2(1):10. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2013.06.05. Ann Transl Med. 2014. PMID: 25332986 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Early regression of severe left ventricular hypertrophy after transcatheter aortic valve replacement is associated with decreased hospitalizations.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jun;7(6):662-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.02.011. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014. PMID: 24947722 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Clinical and echocardiographic features of paradoxical low-flow and normal-flow severe aortic stenosis patients with concomitant mitral regurgitation.Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Mar;36(3):441-446. doi: 10.1007/s10554-019-01735-1. Epub 2019 Nov 27. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020. PMID: 31773341
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Research Materials