Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2000 Sep;83(3):268-70.
doi: 10.1136/adc.83.3.268.

Comparison of an enzyme immunoassay for the detection of Helicobacter pylori antigens in the faeces with the urea breath test

A J Shepherd  1 , C L Williams, C P Doherty, M Hossack, T Preston, K E McColl, L T Weaver
Affiliations

Comparison of an enzyme immunoassay for the detection of Helicobacter pylori antigens in the faeces with the urea breath test

A J Shepherd et al. Arch Dis Child. 2000 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Current diagnostic tests for Helicobacter pylori are invasive (endoscopy) or indirect (urea breath test, serology).

Aims: To evaluate a new enzyme immunoassay (EIA) which detects H pylori antigens in faeces, by comparing its sensitivity and specificity in children with the (13)C urea breath test (UBT).

Methods: A total of 119 children underwent a UBT and provided a faecal sample for antigen testing within seven days. After an overnight fast each child provided a pretest breath sample, and samples at 30 and 40 minutes after ingestion of 100 mg (13)C labelled urea. (13)C enrichment of breath was measured by isotope ratio mass spectrometry. Faeces were stored at -70 degrees C until antigen testing, using the EIA. Samples were read spectrophotometrically at 450 nm and results were interpreted using recommended cut offs of optical density <0.14 as negative, >/=0.16 as positive, with >/=0.14 and <0. 16 representing equivocal results. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated using the manufacturer's cut off compared with UBT.

Results: Sensitivity and specificity were 88% and 82%, respectively. Negative and positive predictive values were 97% and 58%.

Conclusions: The EIA is an alternative, non-invasive, and easy to use method for the detection of H pylori in children. Its high negative predictive value suggests a role in screening out uninfected children.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. BMJ. 1999 Nov 27;319(7222):1409 - PubMed
    1. Commun Dis Public Health. 1999 Jan;2(1):59-63 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1992 Nov 14;340(8829):1194-5 - PubMed
    1. J Infect Dis. 1993 Jul;168(1):219-21 - PubMed
    1. Gut. 1993 Dec;34(12):1681-2 - PubMed

Publication types