Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2000 May-Jun;71(3):543-62.
doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00164.

The construct of resilience: a critical evaluation and guidelines for future work

S S Luthar  1 , D Cicchetti, B Becker
Affiliations
Review

The construct of resilience: a critical evaluation and guidelines for future work

S S Luthar et al. Child Dev. 2000 May-Jun.

Abstract

This paper presents a critical appraisal of resilience, a construct connoting the maintenance of positive adaptation by individuals despite experiences of significant adversity. As empirical research on resilience has burgeoned in recent years, criticisms have been levied at work in this area. These critiques have generally focused on ambiguities in definitions and central terminology; heterogeneity in risks experienced and competence achieved by individuals viewed as resilient; instability of the phenomenon of resilience; and concerns regarding the usefulness of resilience as a theoretical construct. We address each identified criticism in turn, proposing solutions for those we view as legitimate and clarifying misunderstandings surrounding those we believe to be less valid. We conclude that work on resilience possesses substantial potential for augmenting the understanding of processes affecting at-risk individuals. Realization of the potential embodied by this construct, however, will remain constrained without continued scientific attention to some of the serious conceptual and methodological pitfalls that have been noted by skeptics and proponents alike.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Illustrative effects of moderator variables, in interaction with risk status, in relation to competence outcomes: (A) protective, (B) protective-stabilizing, (C) protective-enhancing, (D) protective-reactive, (E) vulnerable-stable, (F) vulnerable-reactive.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Achenbach TM. Taxonomy and comorbidity of conduct problems: Evidence from empirically based approaches. Development and Psychopathology. 1993;5:51–64.
    1. Achenbach TM, McConaughy S, Howell CT. Child / adolescent behavioral and emotional problems: Implications of cross-informant correlations for situational specificity. Psychological Bulletin. 1987;87:213–232. - PubMed
    1. Anthony EJ. Introduction: The syndrome of the psychologically vulnerable child. In: Anthony EJ, Koupernik C, editors. The child in his family: Children at Psychiatric Risk. Vol. 3. Wiley; New York: 1974. pp. 3–10.
    1. Baldwin AL, Baldwin CP, Cole R. Stress-resistant families and stress-resistant children. In: Rolf J, Masten A, Cicchetti D, Nuechterlein K, Weintraub S, editors. Risk and protective factors in the development of psychopathology. Cambridge University Press; New York: 1990. pp. 257–280.
    1. Baldwin AL, Baldwin CP, Kasser T, Zax M, Sameroff A, Seifer R. Contextual risk and resiliency during late adolescence. Development and Psychopathology. 1993;5:741–761.

Publication types