Laparoscopic-assisted vs. open ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease. A comparative study

Abstract

Background: The objective of this study was to compare laparoscopic-assisted ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease of the distal ileum with open surgery in two consecutive groups of patients.

Methods: From 1995 until 1998, 48 patients underwent open ileocolic resection at the Academic Medical Center (AMC) in Amsterdam, while 30 patients had laparoscopic-assisted ileocolic resection at the Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC). Patient characteristics, perioperative course, and recovery were compared. Differences between the groups were tested using Student's t-test for independent groups and chi-square tests when appropriate.

Results: The open and the laparoscopic patient groups were comparable for age, gender, body mass index (BMI), prior abdominal surgery, and length of resected bowel. The conversion rate was 6.6%. Laparoscopic operating times (138+/-SD 36 min) were significantly longer than those observed in the open group (104+/-SD 34 min). Discharge was significantly earlier in the laparoscopic group than the open group (5.7 vs 10.2 postoperative days, p<0.007). Postoperative morbidity did not differ significantly between the patients treated traditionally (14.6%) and laparoscopically (10%).

Conclusion: Compared to open surgery, laparoscopic ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease is associated with similar morbidity rates, a shorter hospital stay, and improved cosmetic results, justifying the laparoscopic approach as the procedure of choice.