Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2000 Apr;17(4):200-6.
doi: 10.1023/a:1009487716328.

Salpingectomy for repeated embryo nonimplantation after in vitro fertilization in patients with severe tubal factor infertility

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Salpingectomy for repeated embryo nonimplantation after in vitro fertilization in patients with severe tubal factor infertility

H Dechaud et al. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2000 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the impact of salpingectomy on the rates of embryo implantation and pregnancy in patients with severe, irreversible tubal factor sterility.

Methods: A retrospective study of patients with repeated failure of in vitro fertilization due to nonimplantation of the embryo. Seventy-two patients with severe and irreversible tubal factor sterility were selected following repeated failure of in vitro fertilization (IVF) due to assumed nonimplantation of the embryo: 35 underwent a salpingectomy before continuing IVF cycles and 37 continued IVF cycles without salpingectomy.

Results: After the first IVF cycle consecutive to diagnosis of embryo nonimplantation, the implantation rate was 10.2% in the salpingectomy group and 6.1% in the group without the procedure (P = 0.5). After all IVF cycles, the rate was, respectively, 6.9% and 4.5% (P = 0.2). Salpingectomy improved the pregnancy rate (PR) per transfer (23.5% vs. 9.9%; P = 0.01). The curves of the cumulative probability of becoming pregnant show that salpingectomy resulted in pregnancy more rapidly.

Conclusions: Salpingectomy improves the PR per transfer in patients with severe and irreversible tubal factor sterility who have experienced repeated failure of IVF due to embryo nonimplantation. This procedure also reduces the number of IVF attempts needed to obtain pregnancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sims JA, Jones D, Butler L, Muasher SJ: Effect of hydrosalpinx on outcome in in-vitro fertilization (Abstr. No. P-032). In American Fertility Society, 1993, p S95
    1. Kassabji M, Sims JA, Butler L, Muasher SJ. Reduced pregnancy outcome in patients with unilateral or bilateral hydrosalpinx after in-vitro fertilization. Eur J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;56:129–132. - PubMed
    1. Dechaud H, Arnal F, Humeau C, Hedon B. Embryo implantation rate changes with the etiology of infertility (Abstr. No. P.-327). IFFS 1995. Contracept Fertil Sex. 1995;23:S144–S145.
    1. Csemiczky G, Landgren BM, Fried G, Wramsby H. High tubal damage grade is associated with low pregnancy rate in women undergoing in-vitro fertilization treatment. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:2438–2440. - PubMed
    1. Vasquez G, Boeckx W, Brosens IA. Prospective study of tubal mucosal lesions and fertility in hydrosalpinges. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:1075–1078. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms