Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2000 Sep;84(3):238-44.
doi: 10.1136/heart.84.3.238.

Coronary heart disease incidence in northern and southern European populations: a reanalysis of the seven countries study for a European coronary risk chart

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Coronary heart disease incidence in northern and southern European populations: a reanalysis of the seven countries study for a European coronary risk chart

A Menotti et al. Heart. 2000 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: A systematic reanalysis of 10 year coronary heart disease incidence data from the northern and the southern European cohorts of the seven countries study, to contribute indirectly to the production of a European coronary risk chart.

Design and setting: Men aged 40-59 years at entry were studied in three northern European cohorts based in Finland and Netherlands (n = 2213); and in 10 southern European cohorts based in Italy, former Yugoslavia, and Greece (n = 5897). Multiple logistic models for the prediction of coronary deaths, coronary incidence (hard criteria), and coronary incidence (any criterion) were solved for the two geographical groups and their pool. Risk factors fed into the models were age, systolic blood pressure, serum total cholesterol, and cigarette smoking.

Results: 10 year coronary heart disease mortality and incidence were higher in northern than in southern Europe, with ratios around 2.65. Ratios among the three coronary heart disease manifestations were identical in the two cultural groupings. Coefficients of the multiple logistic models were similar and not significantly different between the two groupings. When applying the coefficients back to the same or the opposite population, the relative risk was large and similar in the different cultures. Relative risk was larger for more severe coronary heart disease manifestations. The absolute risk was overestimated when applying the northern European model to southern European populations and vice versa, with ratios of about 1.5 and 0.5, respectively. Coronary risk charts created to reproduce the shape of those incorporated in recent European guidelines confirmed the excess of absolute risk in the northern compared with the southern European cohorts, all else being equal.

Conclusions: In theory, a more appropriate European coronary risk chart could be produced by adopting coefficients to correct for different background incidence rates in different cultures. Other coefficients could appropriately be used to transform mortality risk into incidence risk.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Risk chart for the prediction of hard criteria coronary heart disease incidence, derived from the data in tables 5 and 6.

References

    1. Eur Heart J. 2000 Mar;21(5):365-70 - PubMed
    1. Circulation. 1972 Apr;45(4):815-28 - PubMed
    1. World Health Stat Q. 1988;41(3-4):155-78 - PubMed
    1. Clin Chem. 1956 Jun;2(3):145-59 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Epidemiol. 1993 Sep;9(5):527-36 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms