Copayments for ambulatory care: penny-wise and pound-foolish
- PMID: 1095839
- DOI: 10.1097/00005650-197506000-00002
Copayments for ambulatory care: penny-wise and pound-foolish
Abstract
The California "copayment experiment" imposed a charge of $1 on certain Medicaid beneficiaries for the first two visits to a doctor and 50 cents for the first two drug prescriptions each month, effective January 1, 1972. Data on utilization rates were gathered for six months before this date and for 12 months after it. While other administrative requirements, like prior authorization of certain services, doubtless also played a part, it was found that, following the start of copayment, utilization of ambulatory doctor's office visits and other services associated with them showed a decline, relative to that of the non-copayment cohort. After a brief lag, however, hospitalization rates in the copay cohort rose to levels higher than those of the non-copayment cohort-more than offsetting the savings to the state from the reduction of ambulatory service use rates. Due presumably to the neglect of early medical care because of the inhibiting effect of the copayments, these higher use rates of costly hospitalizations suggest that financial deterrents on access to ambulatory service by poor people are penny-wise and pound-foolish, not to mention their effects on health and well-being.
Similar articles
-
Comment on "copayments for ambulatory care: penny-wise and pound-foolish".Med Care. 1976 Mar;14(3):274-7. doi: 10.1097/00005650-197603000-00009. Med Care. 1976. PMID: 772332 No abstract available.
-
Cost-sharing and prior authorization effects on Medicaid services in California: part I. The beneficiaries' reactions.Med Care. 1975 Jul;13(7):582-94. doi: 10.1097/00005650-197507000-00006. Med Care. 1975. PMID: 1095843
-
California's Medi-Cal copayment experiment.Med Care. 1974 Dec;12(12 suppl):1-303. Med Care. 1974. PMID: 4612264 No abstract available.
-
California's Medi-Cal copayment experiment.Med Care. 1974 Dec;12(12):1051-8. doi: 10.1097/00005650-197412000-00010. Med Care. 1974. PMID: 4612263 No abstract available.
-
The impact of Medicaid managed care on hospitalizations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions.Health Serv Res. 2005 Feb;40(1):19-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00340.x. Health Serv Res. 2005. PMID: 15663700 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Why are urban hospital costs so high? The relative importance of patient source of admission, teaching, competition, and case mix.Health Serv Res. 1988 Feb;22(6):821-36. Health Serv Res. 1988. PMID: 3126164 Free PMC article.
-
Economic impact of cost-containment strategies in third party programmes in the US (part I).Pharmacoeconomics. 1993 Aug;4(2):92-103. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199304020-00004. Pharmacoeconomics. 1993. PMID: 10146971
-
Copayments for ambulatory care in Germany: a natural experiment using a difference-in-difference approach.Eur J Health Econ. 2010 Jun;11(3):331-41. doi: 10.1007/s10198-009-0179-9. Epub 2009 Sep 16. Eur J Health Econ. 2010. PMID: 19756797
-
Impact of consumer fees on drug utilisation.Pharmacoeconomics. 1992 Oct;2(4):335-42. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199202040-00008. Pharmacoeconomics. 1992. PMID: 10147046
-
The effects of Medicaid policy changes on adults' service use patterns in Kentucky and Idaho.Medicare Medicaid Res Rev. 2013 Feb 1;2(4):mmrr.002.04.a05. doi: 10.5600/mmrr.002.04.a05. eCollection 2012. Medicare Medicaid Res Rev. 2013. PMID: 24800159 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources