Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2000 Sep;140(3):e12.
doi: 10.1067/mhj.2000.107179.

Effects of diltiazem pretreatment on direct-current cardioversion in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation: a single-blind, randomized, controlled study

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effects of diltiazem pretreatment on direct-current cardioversion in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation: a single-blind, randomized, controlled study

G Q Villani et al. Am Heart J. 2000 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Electric conversion of atrial fibrillation is the most widely used and effective treatment for sinus rhythm restoration. However, it has a limited success rate and a high recurrence rate.

Hypothesis: Pretreatment with calcium channel blocker may improve the efficacy by reversing the so-called "electric remodeling" phenomenon, also related to overload in cytosolic calcium.

Methods: The efficacy of diltiazem or amiodarone pretreatment (oral, 1 month before and 1 month after conversion) on direct-current conversion of persistent atrial fibrillation was assessed in 120 patients, randomly assigned to 3 matched groups: A (n = 44, diltiazem); B (n = 46, amiodarone), and C (n = 30, digoxin).

Results: Before electric conversion, all treatments significantly decreased mean heart rate. Spontaneous conversion to sinus rhythm was achieved in 6% of patients of group A (3 of 46) versus 25% of group B (11 of 44) and 3% (1 of 30) of group C (A/C vs B, P < .005). Current conversion was more successful in group B (91%) compared with group A (76%) and group C (67%) (B vs A/C, P < .05), with no difference in the electric threshold for effective conversion (P = not significant). At the 24-hour time point, early relapse of atrial fibrillation was similar between groups A and B (A, 2%; B, 3%; P = not significant) and lower than group C (12%) (P < .01), whereas at the 1-month time point the recurrence rate was lower in group B (28%) versus groups A (56%) and C (78%) (B vs A/C, P < .01). No significant side effects were reported.

Conclusions: Although diltiazem seems to be as effective as amiodarone in reducing early atrial fibrillation recurrences, diltiazem is less effective in determining spontaneous or electric conversion, with a higher recurrence rate at 2 months. Diltiazem pretreatment could be considered as only a second choice treatment in those patients in whom amiodarone is contraindicated.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types