Comparative long-term evaluation of tacrolimus and cyclosporine in pediatric liver transplantation
- PMID: 10972220
- PMCID: PMC2962406
- DOI: 10.1097/00007890-200008270-00015
Comparative long-term evaluation of tacrolimus and cyclosporine in pediatric liver transplantation
Abstract
Background: In this report, we compare the long-term outcome of pediatric liver transplantation (LTx) patients maintained with tacrolimus-based and with cyclosporine (CsA)-based immunosuppressive therapy. We examine long-term patient and graft survival, the incidence of rejection, and immunosuppression-related complications.
Method: There were 233 consecutive primary LTx in children (ages <18 years) performed between October 1989 and December 1994 with tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive therapy (Group I). These were compared with 120 consecutive primary LTx performed with CsA-based immunosuppressive therapy between January 1988 and October 1989(Group II). Children in both groups were followed until July 1999. Mean follow-up was 91.41+/-17.7 months (range 55.6-117.8) for Group I, and 128+/-6.1 months (range 116.7-138.6) for Group II.
Results: At 9 years of follow-up, actuarial patient and graft survival were significantly improved (patient survival 85.41% in Group I vs. 63.8% in Group II, P=0.0001; graft survival Group I 78.9% vs. 60.8% Group II, P=0.0003) and the rate of re -transplantation was significantly lower among patients in Group I (12% in Group I vs. 22.5% in Group II P=0.01). Children in Group I also experienced a significantly reduced incidence of acute rejection (0.97 per patient Group I vs. 1.5 per patient Group II P=0.002) and significantly less steroid resistant acute rejection episodes (3.1% in Group I vs. 8.6% in Group II P=0.0001). The mean steroid dose was significantly lower in Group I compared with Group II at all time points (P=0.0001) after LTx. Freedom from steroid was also significantly higher in Group I compared with Group II at all time points after LTx (ranging from 78% to 84% in Group I and 9% to 32% in Group II during a 1- to 7-year posttransplant period P=0.0001). The rate of hypertension was significantly lower in Group I than Group II (P=0.0001), and the severity of hypertension (need for more than one anti-hypertensive medication) was also significantly lower in Group I than Group II (P=0.0001). Although the rate of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) was not significantly different (13.7% Group I vs.8.3% Group II, P=0.13), the survival after PTLD was significantly better for Group I at 81.2% than for Group II at 50% after 5 years (P=0.034). Conclusion. The results suggest that tacrolimus-based therapy provides significant long-term benefit to pediatric LTx patients, evidenced by significantly improved patient and graft survival, reduced rate of rejection, and hypertension with lower steroid doses.
Figures







Similar articles
-
Long-term results after conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus in pediatric liver transplantation for acute and chronic rejection.Transplantation. 2000 Jun 27;69(12):2573-80. doi: 10.1097/00007890-200006270-00017. Transplantation. 2000. PMID: 10910279
-
Long-term outcomes in pediatric liver recipients: comparison between cyclosporin A and tacrolimus.Pediatr Transplant. 1999 Feb;3(1):22-6. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3046.1999.00002.x. Pediatr Transplant. 1999. PMID: 10359027
-
Pediatric renal transplantation under tacrolimus-based immunosuppression.Transplantation. 1999 Jan 27;67(2):299-303. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199901270-00020. Transplantation. 1999. PMID: 10075598 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy of immunosuppression monotherapy after liver transplantation: a meta-analysis.World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Sep 14;20(34):12330-40. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i34.12330. World J Gastroenterol. 2014. PMID: 25232269 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Is acute rejection the key predictor for long-term outcomes after renal transplantation when comparing calcineurin inhibitors?Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2009 Jan;23(1):47-52. doi: 10.1016/j.trre.2008.08.005. Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2009. PMID: 19027616 Review.
Cited by
-
Strategies for optimizing immunosuppression in adolescent transplant recipients: a focus on liver transplantation.Paediatr Drugs. 2003;5(3):177-83. doi: 10.2165/00128072-200305030-00004. Paediatr Drugs. 2003. PMID: 12608882 Review.
-
Pediatric liver transplantation.World J Gastroenterol. 2009 Feb 14;15(6):648-74. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.648. World J Gastroenterol. 2009. PMID: 19222089 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Conversion from cyclosporin to tacrolimus in paediatric liver transplant recipients.Paediatr Drugs. 2001;3(9):661-72. doi: 10.2165/00128072-200103090-00004. Paediatr Drugs. 2001. PMID: 11688597 Review.
-
Therapy for acute rejection in pediatric organ transplant recipients.Paediatr Drugs. 2003;5(2):81-93. doi: 10.2165/00128072-200305020-00002. Paediatr Drugs. 2003. PMID: 12529161 Review.
-
Safety and Tolerance of Donor-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Pediatric Living-Donor Liver Transplantation: The MYSTEP1 Study.Stem Cells Int. 2017;2017:2352954. doi: 10.1155/2017/2352954. Epub 2017 Jun 27. Stem Cells Int. 2017. PMID: 28740511 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Reyes J, Mazariegos GV. Pediatric transplantation. Surg Clin North Am. 1999;79(1):163. - PubMed
-
- Alonso EM, Gonzalez-Vallina R, Whitington PF. Update of pediatric liver transplantation. Eur J Pediatr. 1992;151 suppl 1:S23. - PubMed
-
- Andrews W, Sommerauer J, Roden J, Andersen J, Conlin C, Moore P. 10 years of pediatric liver transplantation. J Pediatr Surg. 1996;31(5):619. - PubMed
-
- Andrews WS, Sommerauer J, Conlin C, Moore P. Comparison of cyclosporine- vs tacrolimus-based immunosuppression in pediatric liver transplantation. Transplant Proc. 1996;28(2):897. - PubMed
-
- Dhawan A, Muiesan P. Pediatric liver transplantation. Acta Paediatr Jpn. 1998;40(6):525. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical