Comparative clinical study of doxycycline and minocycline
- PMID: 1097343
Comparative clinical study of doxycycline and minocycline
Abstract
Doxycycline and minocycline were given intravenously to patients with a serious underlying disease who presented a pulmonary infection or a wound infection. Both therapies were easy to administer and well tolerated. However they should not be used in the initial therapy since resistant strains may occur. The clinical and bacteriological effectiveness of doxycycline and minocycline were similar. In pneumococcal pulmonary infections, the rates of favorable clinical response to doxycycline and minocycline were 73% and 76% respectively. In infections caused by bacteroides sp.(mainly infections of wounds), doxycycline or minocycline resulted in a 75% rate of favorable clinical responses and in a 71% rate of favorable bacteriological responses. Adverse side effects were rare and of minor importance with the exception of bacteriological colonization by doxycycline-resistant or minocycline-resistant microorganisms. This complica-tion occurred in 39% of the patients who were treated with these drugs and resulted in clinical superinfection in 8% of the patients.
Similar articles
-
Clinical evaluation of intravenous minocycline.Int J Clin Pharmacol Biopharm. 1977 Apr;15(4):194-8. Int J Clin Pharmacol Biopharm. 1977. PMID: 858651
-
[Treatment of acne vulgaris. A comparison of doxycycline versus minocycline].Hautarzt. 1989 Sep;40(9):577-81. Hautarzt. 1989. PMID: 2530191 Clinical Trial. German.
-
Correlation of in vitro resistance of Staphylococcus aureus to tetracycline, doxycycline, and minocycline with in vivo use.Chemotherapy. 1976;22(5):319-23. doi: 10.1159/000221939. Chemotherapy. 1976. PMID: 947710
-
Comparative safety of tetracycline, minocycline, and doxycycline.Arch Dermatol. 1997 Oct;133(10):1224-30. Arch Dermatol. 1997. PMID: 9382560 Review.
-
Use of long-acting tetracyclines for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections: case series and review of the literature.Clin Infect Dis. 2005 May 15;40(10):1429-34. doi: 10.1086/429628. Epub 2005 Apr 6. Clin Infect Dis. 2005. PMID: 15844065 Review.