Immunological, virological and clinical response to highly active antiretroviral therapy treatment regimens in a complete clinic population. Royal Free Centre for HIV Medicine

Abstract

Background: Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) is now widely used in clinical practice and gives rise to a range of immunological, virological and clinical responses.

Objectives: To describe the immunological, virological and clinical response to HAART and to examine the frequency of modification of the HAART regimen among patients from a single treatment centre.

Methods: Kaplan-Meier estimation and incidence rates were used to describe responses to HAART (a protease inhibitor or non-nucleoside drug in addition to at least two nucleoside analogues) among 421 patients from the Royal Free Hospital in London.

Results: The median CD4 cell count at starting HAART was 186 x 10(6) cells/l [interquartile range (IQR) 76-310] and viral load was 5.13 log10 copies/ml (IQR 4.66-5.56). At 6 months after starting HAART, 51.1% of patients were estimated to have experienced a 100 x 10(6) cells/l increase in CD4 cell count; the median time for viral load to fall below 400 copies/ml was 3.7 months (95% confidence interval 3.2-4.4). At 6 months after the first viral load was < 400 copies/ml, 16.4% of patients were estimated to have failed on the basis of a single viral load > 400 copies/ml and 12.4% were estimated to have failed if the more stringent definition of two viral loads above the limit of detection was used. Compared with the pre-HAART era, the incidence of death among patients on HAART was one sixth of that level; new AIDS-defining illnesses was one seventh; and hospital admissions was one fifth. In total, 141 patients (33.5%) stopped at least one of the antiretroviral agents included as part of their HAART regimen; the occurrence of side effects was the most common reason (n = 63; 44.7%).

Conclusion: A good response occurred to an initial HAART regimen. There was a high rate of virological relapse, which varied considerably according to the definition of failure used. Even so, the rates of clinical progression and hospital admissions observed to date were low. Further follow-up of these patients is required to determine their long-term immunological, virological and clinical outcome.