Unit-treatment interaction and its practical consequences
- PMID: 10985231
- DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00882.x
Unit-treatment interaction and its practical consequences
Abstract
Most statistical characterizations of a treatment effect focus on the average effect of the treatment over an entire population. However, average effects may provide inadequate information, sometimes misleading information, when a substantial unit-treatment interaction is present in the population. It is even possible that a nonnegligible proportion of the individuals in the population experience an unfavorable treatment effect even though the treatment might appear to be beneficial when considering population averages. This paper examines the extent to which information about unit-treatment interaction can be extracted using observed data from a two-treatment completely randomized experiment. A method for utilizing the information from an available covariate is proposed. Although unit-treatment interaction is a nonidentifiable quantity, we show that mathematical bounds for it can be estimated from observed data. These bounds lead to estimated bounds for the probability of an unfavorable treatment effect. Maximum likelihood estimators of the bounds and their corresponding large-sample distributions are given. The use of the estimated bounds is illustrated in a clinical trials data example.
Similar articles
-
Robust estimating functions and bias correction for longitudinal data analysis.Biometrics. 2005 Sep;61(3):684-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00354.x. Biometrics. 2005. PMID: 16135019
-
Hypothesis testing in semiparametric additive mixed models.Biostatistics. 2003 Jan;4(1):57-74. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/4.1.57. Biostatistics. 2003. PMID: 12925330
-
Analysis of overdispersed count data by mixtures of Poisson variables and Poisson processes.Biometrics. 1997 Dec;53(4):1225-38. Biometrics. 1997. PMID: 9423246
-
Handling seizure data: special problems.Epilepsy Res Suppl. 1993;10:175-8. Epilepsy Res Suppl. 1993. PMID: 8251093 Review. No abstract available.
-
What can we learn from clinical trials of anticonvulsant drugs in epilepsy?Eur J Pain. 2002;6 Suppl A:35-44. doi: 10.1053/eujp.2001.0320. Eur J Pain. 2002. PMID: 11888239 Review.
Cited by
-
Cause-effect relationships in analytical surveys: an illustration of statistical issues.Environ Monit Assess. 2003 Apr;83(3):205-27. doi: 10.1023/a:1022681710991. Environ Monit Assess. 2003. PMID: 12718510
-
The Use of Covariates and Random Effects in Evaluating Predictive Biomarkers Under a Potential Outcome Framework.Ann Appl Stat. 2014 Dec;8(4):2336-2355. doi: 10.1214/14-AOAS773. Epub 2014 Dec 19. Ann Appl Stat. 2014. PMID: 26779295 Free PMC article.
-
Causal models and causal modelling in obesity: foundations, methods and evidence.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 Oct 23;378(1888):20220227. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0227. Epub 2023 Sep 4. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023. PMID: 37661742 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Treatment benefit and treatment harm rate to characterize heterogeneity in treatment effect.Biometrics. 2013 Sep;69(3):724-31. doi: 10.1111/biom.12038. Epub 2013 Jul 19. Biometrics. 2013. PMID: 23865447 Free PMC article.
-
Treatment Heterogeneity and Individual Qualitative Interaction.Am Stat. 2012;66(1):16-24. doi: 10.1080/00031305.2012.671724. Epub 2012 Jun 12. Am Stat. 2012. PMID: 23204562 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical