Cardiogenic shock with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded coronaries for Cardiogenic shocK?
- PMID: 10985710
- DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00888-3
Cardiogenic shock with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded coronaries for Cardiogenic shocK?
Abstract
Objectives: We sought to determine the outcomes of patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) complicating non-ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (MI).
Background: Such patients represent a high-risk (ST-segment depression) or low-risk (normal or nonspecific electrocardiographic findings) group for whom optimal therapy, particularly in the setting of shock, is unknown.
Methods: We assessed characteristics and outcomes of 881 patients with CS due to predominant left ventricular (LV) dysfunction in the SHOCK Trial Registry.
Results: Patients with non-ST-segment elevation MI (n = 152) were significantly older and had significantly more prior MI, heart failure, azotemia, bypass surgery, and peripheral vascular disease than patients with ST-elevation MI (n = 729). On average, the groups had similar in-hospital LV ejection fractions (approximately 30%), but patients with non-ST-elevation MI had a lower highest creatine kinase and were more likely to have triple-vessel disease. Among patients selected for coronary angiography, the left circumflex artery was the culprit vessel in 34.6% of non-ST-elevation versus 13.4% of ST-elevation MI patients (p = 0.001). Despite having more recurrent ischemia (25.7% vs. 17.4%, p = 0.058), non-ST-elevation patients underwent angiography less often (52.6% vs. 64.1%, p = 0.010). The proportion undergoing revascularization was similar (36.8% for non-ST-elevation vs. 41.9% ST-elevation MI, p = 0.277). In-hospital mortality also was similar in the two groups (62.5% for non-ST-elevation vs. 60.4% ST-elevation MI). After adjustment, ST-segment elevation MI did not independently predict in-hospital mortality (odds ratio, 1.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.83 to 2.02; p = 0.252).
Conclusions: Patients with CS and non-ST-segment elevation MI have a higher-risk profile than shock patients with ST-segment elevation, but similar in-hospital mortality. More recurrent ischemia and less angiography represent opportunities for earlier intervention, and early reperfusion therapy for circumflex artery occlusion should be considered when non-ST-elevation MI causes CS.
Similar articles
-
Impact of thrombolysis, intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation, and their combination in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries for cardiogenic shocK?J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Sep;36(3 Suppl A):1123-9. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00875-5. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000. PMID: 10985715 Clinical Trial.
-
Angiographic findings and clinical correlates in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries for cardiogenic shocK?J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Sep;36(3 Suppl A):1077-83. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00873-1. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000. PMID: 10985708 Clinical Trial.
-
Outcome and profile of ventricular septal rupture with cardiogenic shock after myocardial infarction: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries in cardiogenic shocK?J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Sep;36(3 Suppl A):1110-6. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00878-0. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000. PMID: 10985713 Clinical Trial.
-
Culprit Vessel-Only Versus Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Complicating ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Collaborative Meta-Analysis.Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Nov;10(11):e005582. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005582. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017. PMID: 29146672 Review.
-
Cardiogenic shock from left ventricular dysfunction complicating an acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction.Am Heart Hosp J. 2009 Summer;7(1):33-8. doi: 10.15420/ahhj.2009.7.1.33. Am Heart Hosp J. 2009. PMID: 19742431 Review.
Cited by
-
Predictive value of the baseline electrocardiogram ST-segment pattern in cardiogenic shock: Results from the CardShock Study.Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2018 Sep;23(5):e12561. doi: 10.1111/anec.12561. Epub 2018 May 30. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2018. PMID: 29846022 Free PMC article.
-
Revascularization Strategies for Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.Curr Cardiol Rep. 2019 Apr 10;21(5):39. doi: 10.1007/s11886-019-1125-9. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2019. PMID: 30969393 Review.
-
Routine invasive versus conservative management in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes.J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2012 Feb;5(1):22-9. doi: 10.1007/s12265-011-9328-5. Epub 2011 Nov 1. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2012. PMID: 22042637 Review.
-
[Acute heart failure and cardiogenic shock: pathophysiology, clinical aspects and management strategies].Internist (Berl). 2005 Mar;46(3):285-97. doi: 10.1007/s00108-005-1359-z. Internist (Berl). 2005. PMID: 15702302 Review. German.
-
Early Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Myocardial Revascularization for Acute Coronary Syndromes Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: A Report From the North-Rhine-Westphalia Surgical Myocardial Infarction Registry.J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 May 21;8(10):e012049. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012049. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019. PMID: 31070076 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical