Utility of positron emission tomography for the staging of patients with potentially operable esophageal carcinoma
- PMID: 10986052
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.18.3202
Utility of positron emission tomography for the staging of patients with potentially operable esophageal carcinoma
Abstract
Purpose: A prospective study of preoperative tumor-node-metastasis staging of patients with esophageal cancer (EC) was designed to compare the accuracy of 18-F-fluoro-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) with conventional noninvasive modalities.
Patients and methods: Seventy-four patients with carcinomas of the esophagus (n = 43) or gastroesophageal junction (n = 31) were studied. All patients underwent attenuation-corrected FDG-PET imaging, a spiral computed tomography (CT) scan, and an endoscopic ultrasound (EUS).
Results: FDG-PET demonstrated increased activity in the primary tumor in 70 of 74 patients (sensitivity: 95%). False-negative PET images were found in four patients with T1 lesions. Thirty-four patients (46%) had stage IV disease. FDG-PET had a higher accuracy for diagnosing stage IV disease compared with the combination of CT and EUS (82% v 64%, respectively; P: =.004). FDG-PET had additional diagnostic value in 16 (22%) of 74 patients by upstaging 11 (15%) and downstaging five (7%) patients. Thirty-nine (53%) of the 74 patients underwent a 2- or 3-field lymphadenectomy in conjunction with primary curative esophagectomy. In these patients, tumoral involvement was found in 21 local and 35 regional or distant lymph nodes (LN). For local LN, the sensitivity of FDG-PET was lower than EUS (33% v 81%, respectively; P: =.027), but the specificity may have been higher (89% v 67%, respectively; P: = not significant [NS]). For the assessment of regional and distant LN involvement, compared with the combined use of CT and EUS, FDG-PET had a higher specificity (90% v 98%, respectively; P: =. 025) and a similar sensitivity (46% v 43%, respectively; P: = NS).
Conclusion: PET significantly improves the detection of stage IV disease in EC compared with the conventional staging modalities. PET improves diagnostic specificity for LN staging.
Comment in
-
Positron emission tomography: another useful test for staging esophageal cancer.J Clin Oncol. 2000 Sep 15;18(18):3199-201. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.18.3199. J Clin Oncol. 2000. PMID: 10986051 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of the diagnostic value of 3-deoxy-3-18F-fluorothymidine and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the assessment of regional lymph node in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a pilot study.Dis Esophagus. 2012 Jul;25(5):416-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2011.01259.x. Epub 2011 Sep 23. Dis Esophagus. 2012. PMID: 21951837 Clinical Trial.
-
[Positron emission tomography for preoperative lymph node diagnosis in esophageal carcinoma].Chirurg. 2003 Oct;74(10):922-30; discussion 929-30. doi: 10.1007/s00104-003-0711-x. Chirurg. 2003. PMID: 14605734 German.
-
Histopathologic validation of lymph node staging with FDG-PET scan in cancer of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction: A prospective study based on primary surgery with extensive lymphadenectomy.Ann Surg. 2000 Dec;232(6):743-52. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200012000-00003. Ann Surg. 2000. PMID: 11088069 Free PMC article.
-
Role of positron emission tomography in the (re-)staging of oesophageal cancer.Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 2006;(243):116-22. doi: 10.1080/00365520600664409. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 2006. PMID: 16782630 Review.
-
Utility of PET, CT, and EUS to identify pathologic responders in esophageal cancer.Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Oct;78(4):1152-60; discussion 1152-60. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.04.046. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004. PMID: 15464463 Review.
Cited by
-
Positron Emission Tomography's Utility in Esophageal Cancer Management.J Thorac Dis. 2009 Dec;1(1):29-33. J Thorac Dis. 2009. PMID: 22262999 Free PMC article.
-
Esophageal cancer - the utility of PET/CT in staging prior to chemoradiation.Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2023 Nov 16;28(5):608-611. doi: 10.5603/rpor.96869. eCollection 2023. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2023. PMID: 38179288 Free PMC article.
-
New approach to malignant strictures of the esophagus.Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2003 Jun;5(3):198-205. doi: 10.1007/s11894-003-0020-z. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2003. PMID: 12734041 Review.
-
Adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and the esophagogastric junction: positron emission tomography improves staging and prediction of survival in distant but not in locoregional disease.J Gastrointest Surg. 2004 Dec;8(8):988-96. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2004.09.040. J Gastrointest Surg. 2004. PMID: 15585386
-
FDG-PET parameters as prognostic factor in esophageal cancer patients: a review.Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Nov;18(12):3338-52. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1732-1. Epub 2011 May 3. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011. PMID: 21537872 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous