Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2000 Sep;20(3):469-88.

Bone densitometry

Affiliations
  • PMID: 10986616
Review

Bone densitometry

M Maricic et al. Clin Lab Med. 2000 Sep.

Abstract

Assessment of BMD has become the essential part of evaluation of patients at risk of osteoporosis. It is likely that different BMD technologies will coexist in clinical practice in the future depending on varying clinical needs. DXA is currently the leading bone density technique because it has the capacity to measure axial and appendicular sites, superior monitoring capabilities, and more sophisticated reference databases and quality control procedures. More rapid and portable peripheral devices, such as peripheral DXA, peripheral instantaneous x-ray imager, and QUS, will likely be used for screening. This large variety of available bone densitometry techniques will provide a wide selection for clinicians to choose from. It may also add confusion, however, about which devices should be used and how to interpret data from different techniques. It is critical for clinicians to have a basic understanding of the technology being used, and the clinical advantages and disadvantages of each instrument, to choose properly which test to perform and interpret the obtained results. When combined with other major risks for fracture, such as age and prior fragility fractures, knowledge of the BMD is an invaluable tool in the assessment of patients with known or suspected osteoporosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources