Are women really more aggressive than men in intimate relationships? Comment on Archer (2000)
- PMID: 10989617
- DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.126.5.685
Are women really more aggressive than men in intimate relationships? Comment on Archer (2000)
Abstract
J. Archer's (2000) conclusion that women engage in slightly more physical aggression than men in intimate relationships but sustain more injuries is reasonable in representative samples. However, his conclusions will provoke negative reactions because they do not fit with the data and belief that men are generally more aggressive than women. In addition, they are incompatible with observations of professionals who serve battered women. Basically, the meta-analytic conclusion about aggression cannot be generalized to samples of physically abusive men and their partners. Nonetheless, the studies reviewed by Archer provide convincing data that physical aggression by women must be taken seriously if there is a sincere desire to prevent partner abuse.
Comment in
-
Sex differences in physical aggression to partners: a reply to Frieze (2000), O'Leary (2000), and White, Smith, Koss, and Figueredo (2000).Psychol Bull. 2000 Sep;126(5):697-702. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.126.5.697. Psychol Bull. 2000. PMID: 10989619 Review.
Comment on
-
Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: a meta-analytic review.Psychol Bull. 2000 Sep;126(5):651-680. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.126.5.651. Psychol Bull. 2000. PMID: 10989615
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
