Retrospective analysis of surgical outcome, symptom changes, and hearing improvement following myringoplasty
- PMID: 11003075
Retrospective analysis of surgical outcome, symptom changes, and hearing improvement following myringoplasty
Abstract
This study examines the surgical and audiologic results of myringoplasty and what factors affect these outcomes. It also examines whether patients experience any improvement in their main symptoms following surgery. This was a retrospective analysis of case notes, patient questionnaires, and audiograms of all patients undergoing myringoplasty between 1990 and 1995 at Walsgrave Hospital, Coventry, UK. Overall success of myringoplasty for consultants was 81% and for trainees was 79%, with an overall success rate of 86% in children. Posterior and inferior perforations had a 90% success rate for repair, compared to only 67% of anterior perforations. There was a statistically significant reduction in air-bone gaps following myringoplasty, and the majority of patients felt that their ears were drier and had improved hearing. Myringoplasty is a successful procedure in the hands of consultants and trainees alike. The results are satisfactory enough to justify surgery purely for deafness and also in symptomatic children. There is a strong correlation between surgical success and resolution of symptoms and generally a satisfactory improvement in hearing.
Similar articles
-
Long-term follow-up evaluation of mastoidectomy in children with non-cholesteatomatous chronic suppurative otitis media.Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2006 Apr;70(4):711-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2005.09.005. Epub 2005 Oct 11. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2006. PMID: 16225934 Clinical Trial.
-
A multivariate analysis of otological, surgical and patient-related factors in determining success in myringoplasty.Clin Otolaryngol. 2005 Apr;30(2):115-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.2004.00947.x. Clin Otolaryngol. 2005. PMID: 15839862
-
Do patients with sclerotic mastoids require aeration to improve success of tympanoplasty?Acta Otolaryngol. 2010 Aug;130(8):909-12. doi: 10.3109/00016480903559731. Acta Otolaryngol. 2010. PMID: 20095922
-
Success and pitfalls in myringoplasty: follow-up study of 404 cases.Am J Otol. 1993 May;14(3):301-5. Am J Otol. 1993. PMID: 8372930 Review.
-
Management of cerebrospinal fluid leaks involving the temporal bone: report on 92 patients.Laryngoscope. 2003 Jan;113(1):50-6. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200301000-00010. Laryngoscope. 2003. PMID: 12514382 Review.
Cited by
-
Success rates for various graft materials in tympanoplasty - A review.J Otol. 2020 Sep;15(3):107-111. doi: 10.1016/j.joto.2020.01.001. Epub 2020 Jan 7. J Otol. 2020. PMID: 32884562 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Tympanoplasty: surgical results and a comparison of the factors that may interfere in their success.Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2006 Mar-Apr;72(2):267-71. doi: 10.1016/s1808-8694(15)30067-7. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2006. PMID: 16951864 Free PMC article.
-
Is Gelfoam Necessary for Middle Ear Surgery: A Comparative Study of the Results of Tympanoplasty With and Without Gelfoam in the Middle Ear.Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Aug;74(Suppl 1):281-287. doi: 10.1007/s12070-020-02057-8. Epub 2020 Aug 20. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022. PMID: 36032863 Free PMC article.
-
Is Cholesteatoma a Risk Factor for Graft Success Rate in Chronic Otitis Media Surgery?Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Nov;27(83):417-22. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2015. PMID: 26788485 Free PMC article.
-
Perhaps consider transmeatal approach for microscopic myringoplasty.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Sep;275(9):2413-2414. doi: 10.1007/s00405-017-4778-2. Epub 2017 Nov 10. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018. PMID: 29127506 No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical