Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2000 Aug;26(8):1123-36.
doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(00)00524-1.

Theoretical analysis of ablation depths and profiles in laser in situ keratomileusis for compound hyperopic and mixed astigmatism

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Theoretical analysis of ablation depths and profiles in laser in situ keratomileusis for compound hyperopic and mixed astigmatism

D T Azar et al. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000 Aug.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the theoretical ablation depths and profiles of 4 treatment strategies for compound hyperopic and mixed astigmatism.

Setting: Theoretical analysis.

Methods: Corneal contour drawings of theoretical corneal ablation profiles during laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy were made. The depths of tissue ablation in 4 treatment strategies for compound hyperopic astigmatism (Groups 1 to 4) and for mixed astigmatism (Groups 5 to 8) were compared: (1) combined hyperopic spherical and myopic cylindrical treatments (Groups 1 and 5); (2) combined spherical and hyperopic cylindrical treatments (Groups 2 and 6); (3) combined cylindrical treatments (Groups 3 and 7); (4) combined cross-cylinder and spherical equivalent treatments (Groups 4 and 8).

Results: In compound hyperopic astigmatism, the 4 approaches resulted in identical final curvatures, but the ablation depths were greatest in Group 1 (combined hyperopic spherical and myopic cylindrical treatments). The smallest amount of ablation occurred in Group 2 (combined hyperopic spherical and hyperopic cylindrical treatments) and Group 3 (combined hyperopic cylindrical treatments), which had similar tissue ablation patterns. In mixed astigmatism, the greatest ablation depth was in Group 5, followed by Group 8, and Groups 6 and 7. The tissue ablation depths and profiles were similar in Groups 6 and 7.

Conclusion: The treatment approaches in Groups 2, 3, 6, and 7 (which avoided the use of minus cylinder) resulted in the smallest degree of stromal ablation. Patients with compound hyperopic or mixed astigmatism may benefit from reduced ablation depths by deferring treatment until hyperopic cylindrical and/or combined cylindrical treatments are available.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources