Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2000 Sep;6(5):562-5.
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2516.2000.00411.x.

Synovectomy with rifampicine in haemophilic haemarthrosis

Affiliations

Synovectomy with rifampicine in haemophilic haemarthrosis

F Fernandez-Palazzi et al. Haemophilia. 2000 Sep.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper was to assess the effectiveness of intra-articular injected rifampicine in haemophilic patients in order to achieve synovectomy by preventing repeated intra-articular bleeding. We have used this technique in haemophilic patients previously and reported our results on 13 cases [1]. Two hundred and fifty milligrams of rifampicine was injected into the elbow and ankle joints and 500 mg was injected into knee joints with 3-10 mL of lidocaine, depending on the joint size. The injections were repeated once a week for 7 weeks. Patients were only covered with antihaemophilic factor on the day of the injection at 30% above their coagulation level. We evaluated the results using two measures: subjective reports from the patient and objective assessment by the examiner. In the subjective reports the patient graded the results from their own perspective from 1 (poor) to 10 (excellent): 1-3, poor; 4-6, fair; 7-8, good; and 9-10, excellent. In the objective reports the grading was: excellent ('dry joint', full function, no haemarthrosis, no synovitis); good (clinical improvement, synovitis, reduction of haemarthroses, full function); fair synovitis (reduction of haemarthroses, no change in function); poor synovitis (persistent haemarthroses). This paper reports on the results of 38 patients with 39 joints with more that 3 years follow up, mean 1.8 years. There were 22 knees, nine elbows and eight ankles. Subjectively, there were excellent results in 21 joints (11 knees, six elbows and four ankles) good results in 15 joints (eight knees, three elbows and four ankles), fair results in two knees and a poor result in one knee. Objectively, results obtained were excellent in 20 joints (11 knees, six elbows and three ankles); good in 17 (nine knees, three elbows and five ankles); fair in one knee and poor in one knee.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources