Macular hole surgery with and without internal limiting membrane peeling
- PMID: 11013203
- DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00331-6
Macular hole surgery with and without internal limiting membrane peeling
Abstract
Objective: To compare results of surgery for idiopathic macular hole with and without internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling in a series of consecutive patients over a 5-year period.
Design: A retrospective, nonrandomized, comparative trial with concurrent control group.
Participants: Forty-four eyes with macular holes of less than or equal to 6 months duration without ILM peeling were compared to 116 eyes with ILM peeling and the same hole duration. A third group of 65 eyes with ILM peeling and duration greater than 6 months was also evaluated.
Intervention: All eyes underwent pars plana vitrectomy with or without ILM peeling, intravitreous gas, and positioning face down. No adjunctive therapies were used in any group.
Main outcome measures: Comparing the closure and/or reopening rate, prognosis, visual acuity, and complications for macular holes with and without ILM peeling.
Results: All patients had postsurgical follow-up of 18 months or greater. Primary closure was significantly improved with ILM peeling with 116 of 116 eyes (100%) showing no reopenings versus 36 of 44 holes (82%) primarily closed, 9 of which (25%) reopened without ILM peeling (P: < 0.00001) in holes less than or equal to 6 months. The 27 eyes without ILM peeling that had successful surgery displayed a mean postoperative vision of 20/40, which is the same as the successful eyes with ILM peeling (P: = 0.6). The 52 stage II eyes with ILM peeling had a mean postoperative vision of 20/30, and 48 of the 52 eyes (92%) were 20/40 or better. Stage III eyes (greater than 400-microm holes) without ILM peeling had a poor prognosis, with 6 of the 25 eyes (24%) having initial surgery fail and an additional 4 of 25 eyes (16%) reopening. Without ILM peeling, holes less than 300 microm had only one reopen, whereas holes greater than or equal to 300 microm had 16 of the 17 (94%) primary failures and/or reopenings (P: < 0.001). All 12 holes that reopened and/or primarily failed were repaired with ILM peeling with excellent visual recovery. Macular holes with a duration greater than 6 months were treated with ILM peeling, and 63 of 65 holes (97%) were closed primarily and 65% had an increase in vision by two or more Snellen lines.
Conclusions: ILM peeling significantly improves visual and anatomic success in all stages of recent and chronic macular holes and reopened and failed holes, while eliminating reopening for holes greater than 300 microm.
Similar articles
-
Vitreous surgery with and without internal limiting membrane peeling for macular hole repair.Retina. 2004 Oct;24(5):721-7. doi: 10.1097/00006982-200410000-00006. Retina. 2004. PMID: 15492625 Clinical Trial.
-
Results of macular hole surgery with and without epiretinal dissection or internal limiting membrane removal.Ophthalmology. 2004 Jan;111(1):142-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.05.005. Ophthalmology. 2004. PMID: 14711726
-
Pathogenesis of macular hole recurrence and its prevention by internal limiting membrane peeling.Retina. 2007 Feb;27(2):169-73. doi: 10.1097/01.iae.0000224940.79223.fb. Retina. 2007. PMID: 17290198 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparative efficacy evaluation of inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique and internal limiting membrane peeling in large macular holes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Ophthalmol. 2020 Jan 8;20(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12886-019-1271-2. BMC Ophthalmol. 2020. PMID: 31914954 Free PMC article.
-
Vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling versus no peeling for idiopathic full-thickness macular hole.Ophthalmology. 2014 Mar;121(3):649-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.10.020. Epub 2013 Dec 4. Ophthalmology. 2014. PMID: 24314837
Cited by
-
Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling and Gas Tamponade For Full-Thickness Macular Holes of Different Etiology - Is It Still Relevant?Clin Ophthalmol. 2022 Oct 13;16:3391-3404. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S373675. eCollection 2022. Clin Ophthalmol. 2022. PMID: 36249443 Free PMC article.
-
RETINAL MIGRATION AND SURGICAL OUTCOME AFTER HEMI-TEMPORAL INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE PEELING VERSUS CONVENTIONAL PEELING FOR MACULAR HOLE: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial.Retina. 2024 Oct 1;44(10):1793-1799. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000004196. Epub 2024 Sep 12. Retina. 2024. PMID: 39287542 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Indocyanine green assisted retinal internal limiting membrane removal in stage 3 or 4 macular hole surgery.Br J Ophthalmol. 2003 Jan;87(1):71-4. doi: 10.1136/bjo.87.1.71. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003. PMID: 12488266 Free PMC article.
-
Relationship between macular hole size and the potential benefit of internal limiting membrane peeling.Br J Ophthalmol. 2006 Oct;90(10):1216-7. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2006.097600. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006. PMID: 16980640 Free PMC article.
-
Pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane removal for macular hole associated with proliferative diabetic retinopathy.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005 Jul;243(7):724-6. doi: 10.1007/s00417-004-1081-x. Epub 2005 Jan 19. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005. PMID: 15657774
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous