Clinical outcomes and resource usage in 100 consecutive patients after off-pump coronary bypass procedures

Abstract

Background: Cardiopulmonary bypass initiates a cascade of inflammatory processes that may result in end-organ damage, leading to the increased prevalence of noncardiac complications. Therefore, off-pump coronary artery bypass graft (OP-CAB) procedures have recently been introduced into clinical practice.

Methods: This study was a case-controlled study that compared the outcomes and cost of 100 consecutive OP-CAB procedures with a control group of 100 contemporary matched conventional coronary artery bypass grafting procedures. All operations were performed by a single surgeon (J.H.L. ) and complete revascularization that used off-pump techniques was achieved with the use of innovative exposure techniques to the lateral and posterior wall vessels.

Results: An average of 3.1 grafts per patient were performed in the OP-CAB group (range, 1-5). The incidence of conversion to conventional coronary artery bypass grafting was 1%. The overall mortality rate was 2.0%. There were no instances of stroke, renal failure, or sternal infections in the OPCAB group. Thus, the OP-CAB group had a shorter length of stay (6.1+/-2.5 versus 7.1+/-3.3 d; P =.003), with a corresponding reduction in variable direct cost per case of 29% (P<.001).

Conclusion: Our experience suggests that OP-CAB procedures are feasible for most patients who currently require complete revascularization. It is associated with very a low morbidity rate and may represent the ideal revascularization strategy for patients at high risk for undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass.