Evaluating surgical competency with the American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination, skill testing, and intraoperative assessment

Abstract

Background: Evaluation of surgical competency should include assessment of knowledge, technical skill, and judgment. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between the American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE), skill testing, and intraoperative assessment.

Methods: Postgraduate year 2 (PGY-2) and postgraduate year 3 (PGY-3) surgery residents (n = 33) were tested by means of (1) the ABSITE, (2) skill testing on a laparoscopic video-trainer, and (3) intra-operative global assessments during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The Pearson correlation was used to determine the correlation between the ABSITE, skill testing, and intraoperative assessments. For the comparison of PGY-2 and PGY-3 resident performance, Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used.

Results: The ABSITE scores did not correlate with skill testing or intraoperative assessments (not significant). Skill testing correlated with the intraoperative composite score and with 4 of 8 operative performance criteria (P<.05). The ABSITE scores and skill testing were not different for PGY-2 and PGY-3 residents (not significant). Intraoperative assessments were better in 5 of 8 criteria and the composite score for PGY-3 versus PGY-2 residents (P<.05), which demonstrated construct validity.

Conclusions: The ABSITE measures knowledge but does not correlate with technical skill or operative performance. Residency programs should use multiple assessment instruments to evaluate competency. There may be a role for both skill testing and intraoperative assessment in the evaluation of surgical competency.