Relief of pain following upper abdominal operations by thoracic epidural block with etidocaine
- PMID: 1101616
Relief of pain following upper abdominal operations by thoracic epidural block with etidocaine
Abstract
Bupivacaine and etidocaine were compared in 0.375% and 0.5% solutions (without adrenaline) in a double-blind study in thoracic epidural analgesia following upper abdominal surgery. Special regard was taken to duration and adequacy of analgesia and changes in motor function. Duration of analgesia was roughly comparable for all four solutions. Bupivacaine 0.375% and etidocaine 0.5% seemed to be appropriate concentrations for adequate pain relief. Motor function, as assessed by changes in FVC, FEV1 and PEFR was not influenced to any greater extent. A progressive fall in FVC with successive injections, indicating increasing motor weakness, did not occur.
Similar articles
-
Thoracic epidural analgesia -- a double blind study between etidocaine and bupivacaine.Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl. 1975;60:72-5. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl. 1975. PMID: 1101615 Clinical Trial.
-
Bupivacaine and etidocaine in epidural block for post-operative relief of pain.Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl. 1975;60:80-2. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl. 1975. PMID: 1101617 Clinical Trial. No abstract available.
-
A comparison of etidocaine and bupivacaine for postoperative pain relief.Proc R Soc Med. 1975 Dec;68(12):771-2. doi: 10.1177/003591577506801218. Proc R Soc Med. 1975. PMID: 768990 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial. No abstract available.
-
Comparison between bupivacaine and etidocaine in lumbar epidural block for urological surgery.Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl. 1975;60:68-71. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl. 1975. PMID: 1101614 Clinical Trial.
-
Local analgesic techniques for upper abdominal surgery--endocrine and metabolic effects.Br J Anaesth. 1988 Dec;61(6):649-51. doi: 10.1093/bja/61.6.649. Br J Anaesth. 1988. PMID: 3061421 Review. No abstract available.