A double-blind trial of bupivacaine and etidocaine in epidural block for surgical induction of labour
- PMID: 1101618
A double-blind trial of bupivacaine and etidocaine in epidural block for surgical induction of labour
Abstract
Compared to bupivacaine, etidocaine has a quicker onset of action both in terms of initial analgesia and time taken to reach maximal extent of analgesia. ;owever, its duration of action is significantly shorter and it produces a striking degree of motor loss. These last two properties make etidocaine relatively unsuitable for obstetric practice, where a long duration of action and a reasonable mobility are desirable. However, it has been found useful for forceps delivery, because of the good muscle relaxation obtained and, because of its greater penetration, in abolishing the missed segments sometimes seen with bupivacaine.
Similar articles
-
A double-blind comparison of single doses of etidocaine 1 % and bupivacaine 0.5 % during continuous lumbar epidural block in obstetrics.Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl. 1975;60:97-9. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl. 1975. PMID: 1101619 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison between bupivacaine and etidocaine in lumbar epidural block for urological surgery.Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl. 1975;60:68-71. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl. 1975. PMID: 1101614 Clinical Trial.
-
Epidural anesthesia for surgery: a comparative double-blind study of etidocaine and bupivacaine.Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 1977;28(2):61-74. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 1977. PMID: 337746 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparative study with etidocaine and bupivacaine in epidural block.Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl. 1975;60:55-9. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl. 1975. PMID: 1101611 Clinical Trial.
-
Thoracic epidural analgesia -- a double blind study between etidocaine and bupivacaine.Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl. 1975;60:72-5. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl. 1975. PMID: 1101615 Clinical Trial.