A double-blind comparison of single doses of etidocaine 1 % and bupivacaine 0.5 % during continuous lumbar epidural block in obstetrics
- PMID: 1101619
A double-blind comparison of single doses of etidocaine 1 % and bupivacaine 0.5 % during continuous lumbar epidural block in obstetrics
Abstract
A double-blind investigation of some of the effects of etidocaine 1 % and bupivacaine 0.5 % was undertaken in patients in established labour. The results showed that the duration of bupivacaine was significantly longer than that of etidocaine, while the number of patients with good analgesia was equal in both groups. Motor blockade was less obvious in those patients receiving bupivacaine, but in neither group was this a finding of importance. At 5 minutes the Apgar scores of neonates from both groups were similar and any differences seen at 1 minute may be attributable to factors other than the drugs on trial.
Similar articles
-
Comparative study with etidocaine and bupivacaine in epidural block.Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl. 1975;60:55-9. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl. 1975. PMID: 1101611 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison between bupivacaine and etidocaine in lumbar epidural block for urological surgery.Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl. 1975;60:68-71. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl. 1975. PMID: 1101614 Clinical Trial.
-
Bupivacaine compared with etidocaine for vaginal delivery.Anesth Analg. 1975 Mar-Apr;54(2):250-6. Anesth Analg. 1975. PMID: 1168435
-
A double-blind trial of bupivacaine and etidocaine in epidural block for surgical induction of labour.Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl. 1975;60:94-6. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl. 1975. PMID: 1101618 Clinical Trial.
-
The use of epidural bupivacaine for the relief of childbirth pain.Aust Paediatr J. 1987 Feb;23(1):13-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.1987.tb02169.x. Aust Paediatr J. 1987. PMID: 3304253 Review.