Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of 150-J biphasic shocks compared with 200- to 360-J monophasic shocks in the resuscitation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest victims. Optimized Response to Cardiac Arrest (ORCA) Investigators
- PMID: 11023932
- DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.102.15.1780
Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of 150-J biphasic shocks compared with 200- to 360-J monophasic shocks in the resuscitation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest victims. Optimized Response to Cardiac Arrest (ORCA) Investigators
Abstract
Background: In the present study, we compared an automatic external defibrillator (AED) that delivers 150-J biphasic shocks with traditional high-energy (200- to 360-J) monophasic AEDs.
Methods and results: AEDs were prospectively randomized according to defibrillation waveform on a daily basis in 4 emergency medical services systems. Defibrillation efficacy, survival to hospital admission and discharge, return of spontaneous circulation, and neurological status at discharge (cerebral performance category) were compared. Of 338 patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, 115 had a cardiac etiology, presented with ventricular fibrillation, and were shocked with an AED. The time from the emergency call to the first shock was 8.9+/-3.0 (mean+/-SD) minutes.
Conclusions: The 150-J biphasic waveform defibrillated at higher rates, resulting in more patients who achieved a return of spontaneous circulation. Although survival rates to hospital admission and discharge did not differ, discharged patients who had been resuscitated with biphasic shocks were more likely to have good cerebral performance.
Similar articles
-
Optimal Response to Cardiac Arrest study: defibrillation waveform effects.Resuscitation. 2001 Jun;49(3):233-43. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(01)00321-5. Resuscitation. 2001. PMID: 11719116 Clinical Trial.
-
Transthoracic incremental monophasic versus biphasic defibrillation by emergency responders (TIMBER): a randomized comparison of monophasic with biphasic waveform ascending energy defibrillation for the resuscitation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation.Circulation. 2006 Nov 7;114(19):2010-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.636506. Epub 2006 Oct 23. Circulation. 2006. PMID: 17060379 Clinical Trial.
-
Treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with a low-energy impedance-compensating biphasic waveform automatic external defibrillator. The LIFE Investigators.Biomed Instrum Technol. 1998 Nov-Dec;32(6):631-44. Biomed Instrum Technol. 1998. PMID: 9883348
-
[Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Mechanisms and treatment with automated external defibrillator].Ugeskr Laeger. 2003 Mar 3;165(10):1009-12. Ugeskr Laeger. 2003. PMID: 12645404 Review. Danish.
-
Low-energy biphasic waveform defibrillation reduces the severity of postresuscitation myocardial dysfunction.Crit Care Med. 2000 Nov;28(11 Suppl):N222-4. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200011001-00014. Crit Care Med. 2000. PMID: 11098952 Review.
Cited by
-
Risk factor analyses for the return of spontaneous circulation in the asphyxiation cardiac arrest porcine model.Chin Med J (Engl). 2015 Apr 20;128(8):1096-101. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.155106. Chin Med J (Engl). 2015. PMID: 25881606 Free PMC article.
-
Shock-induced termination of reentrant cardiac arrhythmias: comparing monophasic and biphasic shock protocols.Chaos. 2013 Dec;23(4):043119. doi: 10.1063/1.4829632. Chaos. 2013. PMID: 24387558 Free PMC article.
-
[Transthoracic defibrillation. Physiologic and pathophysiologic principles and their role in the outcome of resuscitation].Anaesthesist. 2004 Feb;53(2):125-36. doi: 10.1007/s00101-003-0635-3. Anaesthesist. 2004. PMID: 14991189 Review. German.
-
Defibrillation in children.J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2010 Jul;3(3):261-6. doi: 10.4103/0974-2700.66526. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2010. PMID: 20930970 Free PMC article.
-
Electric cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.Mo Med. 2010 Jan-Feb;107(1):59-64. Mo Med. 2010. PMID: 20222298 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous