Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: the University of Maryland 3-year experience
- PMID: 11025690
Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: the University of Maryland 3-year experience
Abstract
Purpose: We determined whether laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy decreases the morbidity of renal donation for the donor, while providing a renal allograft of a quality comparable to that of open donor nephrectomy.
Materials and methods: In a 3-year period laparoscopic donor nephrectomy was performed via the transperitoneal approach. We evaluated donor and recipient medical records for preoperative donor characteristics, intraoperative parameters and complications, and postoperative recovery and complications.
Results: Of the 320 laparoscopic donor nephrectomies performed the left kidney was removed in 97.5%. Intraoperative complications, which developed in 10.4% of cases, tended to occur early in the experience and required conversion to open nephrectomy in 5. Average operative time was 31/2 hours and warm ischemia time was 21/2 minutes. As the series progressed, blood loss as well as laparoscopic port size and number decreased but extraction site size remained constant at 7 cm. Urinary retention, prolonged ileus, thigh numbness and incisional hernia were the most common postoperative complications. Postoperative analgesic requirements were low and average hospitalization was 66 hours.
Conclusions: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy appears to be safe and decreases morbidity in the renal donor. Allograft function is comparable to that in open nephrectomy series. The availability of laparoscopic harvesting may be increasing the living donor volunteer pool.
Similar articles
-
Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: the University of Maryland 6-year experience.J Urol. 2004 Jan;171(1):47-51. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000100221.20410.4a. J Urol. 2004. PMID: 14665841
-
[Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: surgical technique and results].Prog Urol. 2006 Jun;16(3):336-42. Prog Urol. 2006. PMID: 16821347 French.
-
Outcomes of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy without intraoperative systemic heparinization.J Urol. 2010 Jun;183(6):2282-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.02.027. Epub 2010 Apr 18. J Urol. 2010. PMID: 20400133
-
Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy--an Iranian model for developing countries: a cost-effective no-rush approach.Exp Clin Transplant. 2004 Dec;2(2):249-53. Exp Clin Transplant. 2004. PMID: 15859937 Review.
-
Open versus laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: a focus on the safety of donors and the need for a donor registry.J Urol. 2007 Nov;178(5):1860-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.07.008. Epub 2007 Sep 17. J Urol. 2007. PMID: 17868736 Review.
Cited by
-
[Laparoscopic transperitoneal donor nephrectomy. Technique and results].Urologe A. 2003 Feb;42(2):218-24. doi: 10.1007/s00120-002-0281-4. Epub 2003 Feb 22. Urologe A. 2003. PMID: 12607090 German.
-
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the incidence of incisional hernia in urological surgery.Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 May 28;409(1):166. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03354-4. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024. PMID: 38805110
-
Warm ischemia time does not correlate with recipient graft function in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.Surg Endosc. 2003 May;17(5):746-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8860-4. Epub 2003 Mar 6. Surg Endosc. 2003. PMID: 12616392
-
Minimally invasive donor nephrectomy: current state of the art.Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2018 Sep;403(6):681-691. doi: 10.1007/s00423-018-1700-3. Epub 2018 Aug 21. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2018. PMID: 30132134 Review.
-
Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS): a report of 150 procedures.Surg Endosc. 2004 Mar;18(3):397-401. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-9030-z. Epub 2004 Jan 23. Surg Endosc. 2004. PMID: 14735341
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials