Differences in prognostic factors and outcomes between women and men undergoing coronary artery stenting
- PMID: 11025832
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.284.14.1799
Differences in prognostic factors and outcomes between women and men undergoing coronary artery stenting
Abstract
Context: Women with coronary artery disease (CAD) are believed to have a higher risk for adverse outcomes than men after conventional coronary interventions. The increasing use of coronary stenting has improved the outcome of patients undergoing coronary interventions, but little is known about the nature of outcomes in men vs women after this procedure.
Objective: To examine whether there are sex-based differences in prognostic factors and in early and late outcomes among CAD patients undergoing coronary stent placement.
Design, setting, and patients: Inception cohort study, at 2 tertiary referral institutions in Germany. Consecutive series of 1001 women and 3263 men with symptomatic CAD who were treated with stenting between May 1992 and December 1998. Patients who underwent stenting in the setting of acute myocardial infarction were excluded.
Main outcome measure: The combined event rates of death and nonfatal myocardial infarction, assessed at 30 days and 1 year after stenting and compared by sex.
Results: Compared with men, women undergoing coronary stenting were significantly older (mean age, 69 vs 63 years) and more likely to present with diabetes, arterial hypertension, or hypercholesterolemia. Women had less extensive CAD, a less frequent history of myocardial infarction and better preserved left ventricular function than men. Women presented an excess risk of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction only during the early period after stenting: the 30-day combined event rate of death or myocardial infarction was 3.1% in women and 1.8% in men (P =.02) and the multivariate-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for women was 2.02 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.27-3.19). At 1 year, the outcome was similar for both women and men (combined event rate for women, 6.0%, and for men, 5.8% (P =.77); multivariate-adjusted HR for women, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.75-1.48]). There was a sex difference in the prognostic value of baseline characteristics: the strongest prognostic factors were diabetes in women and age in men.
Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that 1-year outcomes of women with CAD undergoing coronary artery stenting are similar to those of men. Despite the similarity in outcomes, there are several sex-specific differences in baseline characteristics, clinical course after the intervention, and relative weight of prognostic factors. JAMA. 2000;284:1799-1805.
Similar articles
-
Results of coronary artery stenting in women versus men: a single center experience.Isr Med Assoc J. 2003 Jun;5(6):398-402. Isr Med Assoc J. 2003. PMID: 12841008
-
Benefit of an early invasive management strategy in women with acute coronary syndromes.JAMA. 2002 Dec 25;288(24):3124-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.24.3124. JAMA. 2002. PMID: 12495392 Clinical Trial.
-
Sex-associated differences in clinical outcomes after coronary stenting in patients with diabetes mellitus.Am J Med. 2004 Dec 1;117(11):830-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.02.036. Am J Med. 2004. PMID: 15589486
-
Gender differences in the outcome of cardiac interventions.Herz. 2005 Aug;30(5):375-89. doi: 10.1007/s00059-005-2716-3. Herz. 2005. PMID: 16132240 Review. English, German.
-
Primary stenting in acute myocardial infarction: paving the way to arterial patency.Med J Aust. 1999 Jun 7;170(11):518-9. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1999.tb127873.x. Med J Aust. 1999. PMID: 10397039 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Gender differences in therapeutic recommendation after diagnostic coronary angiography: insights from the Coronary Angiography and PCI Registry of the German Society of Cardiology.Clin Res Cardiol. 2015 Jun;104(6):507-17. doi: 10.1007/s00392-015-0815-6. Epub 2015 Jan 21. Clin Res Cardiol. 2015. PMID: 25875945
-
Gender differences in contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging after acute myocardial infarction.Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Mar;29(3):643-50. doi: 10.1007/s10554-012-0132-3. Epub 2012 Oct 9. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013. PMID: 23053858
-
Retinal vascular calibre and the risk of coronary heart disease-related death.Heart. 2006 Nov;92(11):1583-7. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2006.090522. Epub 2006 Jul 13. Heart. 2006. PMID: 16840510 Free PMC article.
-
Sex Differences in the Clinical Features and Outcomes of Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Treated with Two Generations (Absorb and Magmaris) of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds.J Clin Med. 2021 Aug 24;10(17):3768. doi: 10.3390/jcm10173768. J Clin Med. 2021. PMID: 34501216 Free PMC article.
-
A randomized multicenter trial comparing the XIENCE everolimus eluting stent with the CYPHER sirolimus eluting stent in the treatment of female patients with de novo coronary artery lesions: The SPIRIT WOMEN study.PLoS One. 2017 Aug 10;12(8):e0182632. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182632. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 28796809 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous