Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2000;2000(4):CD001698.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001698.

Electrical stimulation for preventing and treating post-stroke shoulder pain

C I Price  1 , A D Pandyan
Affiliations

Electrical stimulation for preventing and treating post-stroke shoulder pain

C I Price et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000.

Abstract

Background: Shoulder pain after stroke is common and disabling. The optimal management is uncertain, but electrical stimulation (ES) is often used to treat and prevent pain.

Objectives: The objective of this review was to determine the efficacy of any form of surface ES in the prevention and / or treatment of pain around the shoulder at any time after stroke.

Search strategy: We searched the Cochrane Stroke Review Group trials register and undertook further searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL. Contact was established with equipment manufacturers and centres that have published on the topic of ES.

Selection criteria: We considered all randomised trials that assessed any surface ES technique (functional electrical stimulation (FES), transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) or other), applied at any time since stroke for the purpose of prevention or treatment of shoulder pain.

Data collection and analysis: Two reviewers independently selected trials for inclusion, assessed trial quality and extracted the data.

Main results: Four trials (a total of 170 subjects) fitted the inclusion criteria. Study design and ES technique varied considerably, often precluding the combination of studies. Population numbers were small. There was no significant change in pain incidence (Odds Ratio (OR) 0.64; 95% CI 0.19 to 2.14) or change in pain intensity (Standardised Mean Difference (SMD) 0.13; 95% CI -1.0 to 1.25) after ES treatment compared to control. There was a significant treatment effect in favour of ES for improvement in pain-free range of passive humeral lateral rotation (Weighted Mean Difference (WMD) 9.17; 95% CI 1.43 to 16.91). In these studies ES reduced the severity of glenohumeral subluxation (SMD -1.13; 95% CI -1.66 to -0.60), but there was no significant effect on upper limb motor recovery (SMD 0.24; 95% CI -0.14 to 0.62) or upper limb spasticity (WMD 0.05; 95% CI -0.28 to 0.37). There did not appear to be any negative effects of electrical stimulation at the shoulder.

Reviewer's conclusions: The evidence from randomised controlled trials so far does not confirm or refute that ES around the shoulder after stroke influences reports of pain, but there do appear to be benefits for passive humeral lateral rotation. A possible mechanism is through the reduction of glenohumeral subluxation. Further studies are required.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

References to studies included in this review

Faghri 1994 {published data only}
    1. Faghri PD, Rodgers MM, Glaser RM, Bors JG, Ho C, Akuthota P. The effects of functional electrical stimulation on shoulder subluxation, arm function recovery and shoulder pain in hemiplegic stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75:73‐79. - PubMed
Leandri 1990 {published data only}
    1. Leandri M, Parodi CI, Corrieri N, Rigardo S. Comparison of TENS treatments in hemiplegic shoulder pain. Scand J Rehabil Med 1990;22(2):69‐71. - PubMed
Linn 1999 {published and unpublished data}
    1. Linn SL, Granat MH, Lees KR. Prevention of shoulder subluxation after stroke with electrical stimulation. Stroke 1999;30:963‐968. - PubMed
Sonde 1998 {published and unpublished data}
    1. Sonde L, Gip C, Fernaeus SE, Nilsson CG, Viitanen M. Stimulation with low frequency (1.7Hz) transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (low‐TENS) increases motor function of the post‐stroke paretic arm. Scand J Rehab Med 1998;30:95‐99. - PubMed

References to studies excluded from this review

Chantraine 1996 {published data only}
    1. Chantraine A, Frischknecht R, Gremion G. Shoulder electrical stimulation in hemiplegic patients. European J Neurology. 1996; Vol. 3, Supplement 2:9.
Chantraine 1999 {published data only}
    1. Chantraine A, Baribeault A, Uebelhart D, Gremion G. Shoulder pain and dysfunction in hemiplegia: effects of functional electrical stimulation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80:328‐331. - PubMed

Additional references

Albert 1984
    1. Albert A, Andre JM. State of the art of functional electrical stimulation in France. Int Rehabil Med 1984;6:13‐8. - PubMed
Baker 1986
    1. Baker LL, Parker K. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation of the muscles surrounding the shoulder. Physical Therapy 1986;66(12):1930‐7. - PubMed
Binder 1997
    1. Binder‐Macleod SA, Lee SCK. Assessment of the efficacy of functional electrical stimulation in patients with hemiplegia. Top Stroke Rehabil 1997;3(4):88‐98. - PubMed
Bohannon 1986
    1. Bohannon RW, Larkin PA, Smith MB, Horton MG. Shoulder pain in hemiplegia: statistical relationship with five variable. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1986;67:514‐6. - PubMed
De Courval 1990
    1. Courval LP, Barsaukas A, Berenbaum B, Dehaut F, Dussault R, Fontaine FS, et al. Painful shoulder in the hemiplegic and unilateral neglect. Arch Med Phys Rehabil 1990;71:673‐6. - PubMed
Dimitriijevic 1994
    1. Dimitriijevic MM, Soroker N. Mesh‐glove: 2. Modulation of residual upper limb motor control after stroke with whole‐hand electric stimulation. Scand J Rehab Med 1994;26:187‐90. - PubMed
Downie 1978
    1. Downie WW, Leatham PA, Rhind VM, Wright V, Branco JA, Anderson JA. Studies with pain rating scales. Ann Rheum Dis 1978;37:378‐81. - PMC - PubMed
Faghri 1997
    1. Faghri PD. The effects of neuromuscular stimulation‐induced muscle contraction versus elevation on hand edema in CVA patients. J Hand Therapy 1997;10(1):29‐4. - PubMed
Feys 1998
    1. Feys H, Weerdt W, Selz B, Cox Steck G, Spichiger R, Vereek L, et al. Effect of a therapeutic intervention for the hemiplegic upper limb in the acute phase after stroke: a single blind randomized controlled multicentre trial. Stroke 1998;29:785‐92. - PubMed
Glanz 1996
    1. Glanz M, Klawansky S, Stason W, Berkley C, Chalmers TC. Functional electrostimulation in post‐stroke rehabilitation : a meta‐analysis of the randomised controlled trials. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996;77(6):549‐53. - PubMed
Gowland 1982
    1. Gowland C. Recovery of motor function following stroke: profile and predictors. Physio Canada 1982;34(2):77‐84.
Granat 1994
    1. Granat MH. Functional electrical stimulation and rehabilitation. Current Opinion in Orthopaedics 1994;5:90‐5.
Kumar 1995
    1. Kumar VP, Lau HK, Lui J, Pereira BP, Phjo RW. Clinical applications of functional electrical stimulation. Annals Acadm Med, Singapore 1995;24(3):428‐35. - PubMed
Liberson 1961
    1. Liberson WT, Holmquest HJ, Scot D, Dow M. Functional electrotherapy : stimulation of the peroneal nerve synchronised with the swing phase of the gait of hemiplegic patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1961;42:101‐5. - PubMed
Melzack 1975
    1. Melzack R. The McGill Pain Questionnaire : major properties and scoring methods. Pain 1975;1:277‐99. - PubMed
Nakayama 1994
    1. Nakayama H, Jorgensen HS, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: The Copenhagen stroke study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75:394‐8. - PubMed
Pandyan 1997
    1. Pandyan AD, Granat MH, Stott DJ. Effects of electrical stimulation on flexion contractures in the hemiplegic wrist. Clin Rehab 1997;11:123‐30. - PubMed
Pandyan 1999
    1. Pandyan AD, Price CIM, Curless RH, Johnson GR, Barnes MP, Rodgers H. A review of the properties and limitations of the Ashworth and Modified Ashworth Scales as measures of spasticity. Clin Rehab. 1999; Vol. 13:373‐83. - PubMed
Parry 1999
    1. Parry RH, Lincoln NB, Vass CD. Effect of severity of arm impairment on repsonse to additional physiotherapy early after stroke. Clin Rehab 1999;13:187‐98. - PubMed
Potisk 1995
    1. Potisk KP, Gregoric M, Vodovnik L. Effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on spasticity in patients with hemiplegia. Scand J Rehab Med 1995;27:169‐74. - PubMed
Prada 1995
    1. Prada G, Tallis R. Treatment of the neglect syndrome in stroke patients using a contingency electrical stimulator. Clin Rehab 1995;9:304‐13.
Price 1994
    1. Price DD, Bush FM, Long S, Harkins SW. A comparison of pain measurement characteristics of mechanical visual analogue and simple numerical rating scales. Pain 1994;56:217‐26. - PubMed
Price 1999
    1. Price CIM, Curless RH, Rodgers H. Can stroke patients use visual analogue scales?. Stroke 1999;30:1357‐61. - PubMed
Roy 1994
    1. Roy C, Sands M, Hill L. Shoulder pain in acutely admitted hemiplegics. Clinical Rehabilitation 1994;8:334‐40.
Roy 1995
    1. Roy C. W, Sands M.R, Hill L.D, Harrison A, Marshall S [The effect of shoulder pain on outcome of acute hemiplegia]. Clin Rehab 1995;9:21‐7.
Van Ouwenaller 1986
    1. Ouwenaller C, Laplace P, Chantraine A. Painful shoulder in hemiplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1986;6:22‐36. - PubMed
Wanklyn 1996
    1. Wanklyn P, Forster A, Young J. Hemiplegic shoulder pain (HSP) : natural history and investigation of associated features. Disability and Rehabil 1996;18(10):497–501. - PubMed
Wyller 1997
    1. Wyller TB, Sveen U, Sodring KM, Pettersen Bautz‐Holter E. Subjective well‐being one year after stroke. Clin Rehab 1997;11:139‐45. - PubMed
Zorowitz 1996
    1. Zorowitz R, Hughes M. Shoulder pain & subluxation after stroke:coincidence?. Am J Occup Ther 1996;50(3):194‐201. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms