The controversy of prostate screening
- PMID: 11035306
- PMCID: PMC6466612
- DOI: 10.1067/mgn.2000.110829
The controversy of prostate screening
Abstract
Within the context of aging and ageism, this article evaluates current research on the benefits and risks of prostate cancer screening. Prostate cancer is a concern for many men because it often strikes in the prime of life. Prostate cancer is the most common form of cancer in American men and the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality after lung cancer. Although the disease can be cured if discovered early, it is a slow-growing malignancy that leads to an agonizing death if left untreated. Differential diagnosis often is complicated by comorbid conditions that are part of the normal aging process. Moreover, practitioners' judgment often is prejudiced by common aging misconceptions. Despite the benefits of early screening and detection, the benefits of screening initiatives remain controversial.
References
-
- American Cancer Society. Cancer facts & figures 2000. Atlanta: The Society; 2000.
-
- Walsh PC. Cancer surveillance series: interpreting trends in prostate cancer—part I: evidence of the effects of screening in recent prostate cancer incidence,mortality, and survival rates. J Urol 2000;163:364–5. - PubMed
-
- American Urological Association. PSA rising. Available from: http://www.psa-rising.com/medicalpike/psatesting_auafeb2000.htm.
-
- Butler RN. Ageism. In: Maddox GL, editor. The encyclopedia of aging. New York: Springer; 1987. p. 22–3.
-
- Palmore EB. The facts on aging quiz. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 1998.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
