Ethnic differences in admissions to secure forensic psychiatry services
- PMID: 11040885
- DOI: 10.1192/bjp.177.3.241
Ethnic differences in admissions to secure forensic psychiatry services
Abstract
Background: Persons of African-Caribbean origin are more frequently imprisoned, and increasing evidence suggests they are detained more frequently in psychiatric hospitals, following offending behaviour.
Aims: To estimate population-based prevalence rates of treated mental disorder in different ethnic groups compulsorily admitted to secure forensic psychiatry services.
Method: A survey was recorded of 3155 first admissions, from 1988 to 1994, from half of England and Wales, with 1991 census data as the denominator adjusted for under-enumeration.
Results: Compulsory admissions for Black males were 5.6 (CI 5.1-6.3) times as high as, and for Asian males were half, those for White males; for Black females, 2.9 (CI 2.4-4.6) times as high and for Asian females one-third of those for White females. Admissions of non-Whites rose over the study period. Patterns of offending and diagnoses differed between ethnic groups.
Conclusions: Variations in compulsory hospitalisation cannot be entirely attributed to racial bias. Community-based services may be less effective in preventing escalating criminal and dangerous behaviour associated with mental illness in African-Caribbeans.
Comment in
-
Ethnic differences in forensic hospitalisation.Br J Psychiatry. 2000 Dec;177:566. doi: 10.1192/bjp.177.6.566-a. Br J Psychiatry. 2000. PMID: 11102340 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical