Comparison of the effects of clozapine, haloperidol, chlorpromazine and d-amphetamine on performance on a time-constrained progressive ratio schedule and on locomotor behaviour in the rat
- PMID: 11041315
- DOI: 10.1007/s002130000486
Comparison of the effects of clozapine, haloperidol, chlorpromazine and d-amphetamine on performance on a time-constrained progressive ratio schedule and on locomotor behaviour in the rat
Abstract
Performance on progressive ratio schedules has been proposed as a means of assessing the effects of drugs on "reinforcer efficacy". It has been proposed that the effects of neuroleptic drugs on operant behaviour are mediated by a reduction of "reinforcer efficacy". We examined the effects of two "conventional" neuroleptics (haloperidol and chlorpromazine) and an "atypical" neuroleptic (clozapine) on progressive ratio schedule performance; d-amphetamine was used as a comparison compound. In experiment 1, rats responded for a sucrose reinforcer on a time-constrained progressive ratio schedule (75-min sessions). After 66 preliminary training sessions, the rats received single doses (IP) of haloperidol (0.05, 0.1 mg kg(-1)). chlorpromazine (2, 4 mg kg(-1)), clozapine (0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8 mg kg(-1)), and d-amphetamine (0.2, 0.4, 0.8 mg kg(-1)), and the corresponding vehicle solutions. The highest ratio completed was reduced by haloperidol and chlorpromazine, and increased by clozapine. All three neuroleptics reduced the peak response rate, at least at the highest doses administered. Response rates on the lower and intermediate ratios could be described by a three-parameter equation proposed to account for fixed ratio schedule performance. Haloperidol reduced, and clozapine dose-dependently increased the "motivational" parameter (a); d-amphetamine reduced it at low doses and increased it at high doses. The three neuroleptics increased the "response time" parameter (delta). Un-reinforced locomotor behaviour, measured in experiment 2, was not significantly altered by haloperidol, chlorpromazine or clozapine, but was increased by d-amphetamine. These results are consistent with a reduction of reinforcer efficacy produced by haloperidol and an increase produced by clozapine; clozapine's effect is unlikely to reflect a general increase in locomotion. All three neuroleptics induced some degree of motor debilitation. The quantitative analysis of progressive ratio schedule performance may provide a useful adjunct to existing methods for separating effects of drugs on motivational and motor processes.
Similar articles
-
A theory of behaviour on progressive ratio schedules, with applications in behavioural pharmacology.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2012 Aug;222(4):549-64. doi: 10.1007/s00213-012-2771-4. Epub 2012 Jul 3. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2012. PMID: 22752382 Review.
-
Quantitative analysis of the effects of some "atypical" and "conventional" antipsychotics on progressive ratio schedule performance.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2005 May;179(2):489-97. doi: 10.1007/s00213-004-2049-6. Epub 2004 Nov 25. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2005. PMID: 15565430
-
Effects of amisulpride and aripiprazole on progressive-ratio schedule performance: comparison with clozapine and haloperidol.J Psychopharmacol. 2012 Sep;26(9):1231-43. doi: 10.1177/0269881111421974. Epub 2011 Oct 3. J Psychopharmacol. 2012. PMID: 21969105
-
Comparison of the effects of clozapine and 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT) on progressive ratio schedule performance: evidence against the involvement of 5-HT1A receptors in the behavioural effects of clozapine.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2005 Sep;181(2):381-91. doi: 10.1007/s00213-005-2258-7. Epub 2005 Oct 14. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2005. PMID: 15830225
-
What is a "low dose" of d-amphetamine for inducing behavioral effects in laboratory rats?Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2001 Jan 1;153(2):155-69. doi: 10.1007/s002130000580. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2001. PMID: 11205415 Review.
Cited by
-
Role of the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus in sensorimotor gating and reward-related behavior in rats.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2005 May;179(2):402-8. doi: 10.1007/s00213-004-2052-y. Epub 2004 Oct 30. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2005. PMID: 15821954
-
A theory of behaviour on progressive ratio schedules, with applications in behavioural pharmacology.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2012 Aug;222(4):549-64. doi: 10.1007/s00213-012-2771-4. Epub 2012 Jul 3. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2012. PMID: 22752382 Review.
-
Rimonabant abolishes sensitivity to workload changes in a progressive ratio procedure.Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2012 Jun;101(4):575-80. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2012.03.004. Epub 2012 Mar 9. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2012. PMID: 22425597 Free PMC article.
-
Differential involvement of serotonin and dopamine systems in cost-benefit decisions about delay or effort.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2005 May;179(3):587-96. doi: 10.1007/s00213-004-2059-4. Epub 2004 Dec 10. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2005. PMID: 15864561
-
Chronic stress impairs spatial memory and motivation for reward without disrupting motor ability and motivation to explore.Behav Neurosci. 2006 Aug;120(4):842-51. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.120.4.842. Behav Neurosci. 2006. PMID: 16893290 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources