The comparative efficacy of minocycline and penicillin-V in Staphylococcus aureus skin and soft tissue infections
- PMID: 110520
The comparative efficacy of minocycline and penicillin-V in Staphylococcus aureus skin and soft tissue infections
Abstract
The antistaphylococcal properties of orally administered minocycline and penicillin-V were compared for one hundred and fifteen patients receiving minocycline and one hundred and twenty-eight receiving penicillin-V for various types of cutaneous infections. The majority of bacterial isolates were staphylococcal organisms. Of these 82 percent showed initial in vitro sensitivity to minocycline while only 20 percent did to penicillin-V. The percentage of clinical cures was higher with minocycline (74 percent) than with penicillin-V (54 percent), however, most patients, in both groups, showed clinical improvement. The rate of clinical improvement appeared to be significantly faster with minocycline. There was a higher percentage of adverse, chiefly vestibular, effects in the minocycline group (16 percent vs 7 percent). The study clearly demonstrates the superior antistaphylococcal properties of minocycline as compared with penicillin-V.
Similar articles
-
A comparative trial of minocycline and cloxacillin in the treatment of soft tissue infections due to tetracycline resistant Staphylococcus aureus.West Afr J Pharmacol Drug Res. 1976 Dec;3(2):103-10. West Afr J Pharmacol Drug Res. 1976. PMID: 1051950 No abstract available.
-
Minocycline in staphylococcal soft-tissue infections.Arch Dermatol. 1975 Jul;111(7):874-6. Arch Dermatol. 1975. PMID: 1041230
-
[A child case of infective endocarditis due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus--analysis of the therapeutic course and drug sensitivity of detected organisms].Kansenshogaku Zasshi. 1987 Feb;61(2):178-88. doi: 10.11150/kansenshogakuzasshi1970.61.178. Kansenshogaku Zasshi. 1987. PMID: 3112278 Japanese. No abstract available.
-
Use of long-acting tetracyclines for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections: case series and review of the literature.Clin Infect Dis. 2005 May 15;40(10):1429-34. doi: 10.1086/429628. Epub 2005 Apr 6. Clin Infect Dis. 2005. PMID: 15844065 Review.
-
Second-generation tetracyclines, a dermatologic overview: clinical uses and pharmacology.Cutis. 1991 Nov;48(5):411-7. Cutis. 1991. PMID: 1764965 Review.
Cited by
-
Doxycycline versus cephalexin treatment of presumed streptococcal skin and soft tissue infection among adults presenting to the emergency department.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2024 Feb 7;68(2):e0128223. doi: 10.1128/aac.01282-23. Epub 2024 Jan 3. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2024. PMID: 38169286 Free PMC article.
-
Use of oral tetracyclines in the treatment of adult outpatients with skin and skin structure infections: Focus on doxycycline, minocycline, and omadacycline.Pharmacotherapy. 2021 Nov;41(11):915-931. doi: 10.1002/phar.2625. Epub 2021 Oct 5. Pharmacotherapy. 2021. PMID: 34558677 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Interventions for impetigo.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jan 18;1(1):CD003261. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003261.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012. PMID: 22258953 Free PMC article.