Prospective multicenter study of antibiotic prophylaxis in operative treatment of appendicitis
- PMID: 11053945
- DOI: 10.1159/000018881
Prospective multicenter study of antibiotic prophylaxis in operative treatment of appendicitis
Abstract
Background/aims: A prospective, multicenter observation study was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis in the operative treatment of appendicitis.
Methods: Between June 1996 and May 1997, a total of 4,968 patients underwent an operation for appendicitis at 34 East German hospitals. 41.4% (n = 2,424) received perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis whereas in 58.9% of the cases this was not given. The patients who received antibiotic prophylaxis constituted a negative selection, both with regard to risk factors and to the stage of inflammation.
Results: In the total test group, the rate for septic disorders of wound healing amounted to 2.5% (n = 120). The use of antibiotic prophylaxis makes it possible to significant lower the incidence of postoperative septic disorders of wound healing (p < 0.001). In both conventional (0.7% with prophylaxis vs. 3.8% without) and in laparoscopic appendectomy (0 vs. 1.0%) the rate for septic disorders of wound healing can be reduced (p < 0.001). The global comparison irrespective of possible antibiotic prophylaxis shows a significant advantage for appendectomies which started with laparoscopy (p = 0.008), but in the subgroups with prophylaxis this advantage is completely neutralized (p = 0.78).
Conclusion: From this one can deduce that conventional appendectomy with antibiotic prophylaxis comprises no higher risk of wound infection than laparoscopy, since the risk of conversion exists for every operation begun by laparoscopy. These results would lead to the conclusion that antibiotic prophylaxis should be given before every appendectomy, whether by laparoscopy or conventional methods.
Copyright 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel
Similar articles
-
Antibiotic Duration After Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Acute Complicated Appendicitis.JAMA Surg. 2016 Apr;151(4):323-9. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.4236. JAMA Surg. 2016. PMID: 26580850
-
[Open versus laparoscopic operation for perforated appendicitis--a comparative study].Zentralbl Chir. 2005 Apr;130(2):137-41. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-836411. Zentralbl Chir. 2005. PMID: 15849658 German.
-
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis.J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Jul;205(1):60-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.03.017. J Am Coll Surg. 2007. PMID: 17617333
-
Pediatric laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis.Surg Endosc. 2004 Jan;18(1):75-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8868-9. Epub 2003 Nov 21. Surg Endosc. 2004. PMID: 14625753 Review.
-
[Antibiotic prophylaxis in appendectomy. Often neglected--but necessary!].Zentralbl Chir. 1998;123 Suppl 4:82-4. Zentralbl Chir. 1998. PMID: 9880882 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Oral metronidazole as antibiotic prophylaxis for patients with nonperforated appendicitis.Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2011;4:273-6. doi: 10.2147/CEG.S18153. Epub 2011 Dec 7. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2011. PMID: 22235170 Free PMC article.
-
The significance of Meckel's diverticulum in appendicitis--a retrospective analysis of 233 cases.World J Surg. 2005 Apr;29(4):455-8. doi: 10.1007/s00268-004-7615-x. World J Surg. 2005. PMID: 15776296
-
Comparison of evidence on harms of medical interventions in randomized and nonrandomized studies.CMAJ. 2006 Feb 28;174(5):635-41. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.050873. CMAJ. 2006. PMID: 16505459 Free PMC article.
-
Risk of surgical site infection and efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis: a cohort study of appendectomy patients in Thailand.BMC Infect Dis. 2006 Jul 12;6:111. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-6-111. BMC Infect Dis. 2006. PMID: 16836755 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical