Patient race and decisions to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatments for seriously ill hospitalized adults. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments
- PMID: 11059436
- DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9343(99)00312-5
Patient race and decisions to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatments for seriously ill hospitalized adults. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments
Abstract
Purpose: Patient race is associated with decreased resource use for seriously ill hospitalized adults. We studied whether this difference in resource use can be attributed to more frequent or earlier decisions to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining therapies.
Subjects and methods: We studied adults with one of nine illnesses that are associated with an average 6-month mortality of 50% who were hospitalized at five geographically diverse teaching hospitals participating in the Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments (SUPPORT). We examined the presence and timing of decisions to withhold or withdraw ventilator support and dialysis, and decisions to withhold surgery. Analyses were adjusted for demographic characteristics, prognosis, severity of illness, function, and patients' preferences for life-extending care.
Results: The mean (+/- SD) age of the patients was 63 +/- 16 years; 16% were African-American, 44% were women, and 53% survived for 6 months or longer. Of the 9,076 patients, 5,349 (59%) had chart documentation that ventilator support had been considered in the event the patient's condition required such a treatment to sustain life, 2,975 charts (33%) had documentation regarding major surgery, and 1,293 (14%) had documentation of discussions about dialysis. There were no significant differences in the unadjusted rates of decisions to withhold or withdraw treatment among African-Americans compared with non-African-Americans: among African-Americans, 33% had a decision made to withhold or withdraw ventilator support compared with 35% among other patients, 14% had a decision made to withhold major surgery compared with 12% among other patients, and 25% had a decision made to withhold or withdraw dialysis compared with 30% among other patients (P >0.05 for all comparisons). After adjustment for demographic characteristics, prognosis, illness severity, function, and preferences for care, there were no differences in the timing or rate of decisions to withhold or withdraw treatments among African-Americans compared with non-African-American patients.
Conclusion: Patient race does not appear to be associated with decisions to withhold or withdraw ventilator support or dialysis, or to withhold major surgery, in seriously ill hospitalized adults.
Similar articles
-
Patient age and decisions to withhold life-sustaining treatments from seriously ill, hospitalized adults. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment.Ann Intern Med. 1999 Jan 19;130(2):116-25. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-130-2-199901190-00005. Ann Intern Med. 1999. PMID: 10068357
-
Decision-Making on Withholding or Withdrawing Life Support in the ICU: A Worldwide Perspective.Chest. 2017 Aug;152(2):321-329. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.04.176. Epub 2017 May 5. Chest. 2017. PMID: 28483610
-
Age-related differences in care preferences, treatment decisions, and clinical outcomes of seriously ill hospitalized adults: lessons from SUPPORT.J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000 May;48(S1):S176-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb03129.x. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000. PMID: 10809472
-
The effects of patient race on outcomes in seriously ill patients in SUPPORT: an overview of economic impact, medical intervention, and end-of-life decisions. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments.J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000 May;48(S1):S194-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb03132.x. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000. PMID: 10809475 Review.
-
Review of the literature on cultural competence and end-of-life treatment decisions: the role of the hospitalist.J Natl Med Assoc. 2009 Sep;101(9):920-6. doi: 10.1016/s0027-9684(15)31040-3. J Natl Med Assoc. 2009. PMID: 19806850 Review.
Cited by
-
"It's like crossing a bridge" complexities preventing physicians from discussing deactivation of implantable defibrillators at the end of life.J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Jan;23 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):2-6. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0237-x. J Gen Intern Med. 2008. PMID: 18095036 Free PMC article.
-
Is it safe? Talking to teens with HIV/AIDS about death and dying: a 3-month evaluation of Family Centered Advance Care (FACE) planning - anxiety, depression, quality of life.HIV AIDS (Auckl). 2010;2:27-37. doi: 10.2147/hiv.s7507. Epub 2010 Feb 18. HIV AIDS (Auckl). 2010. PMID: 22096382 Free PMC article.
-
Racial variation in end-of-life intensive care use: a race or hospital effect?Health Serv Res. 2006 Dec;41(6):2219-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00598.x. Health Serv Res. 2006. PMID: 17116117 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of Race and Ethnicity on In-Hospital Mortality in Patients with COVID-19.Ethn Dis. 2021 Jul 15;31(3):389-398. doi: 10.18865/ed.31.3.389. eCollection 2021 Summer. Ethn Dis. 2021. PMID: 34295125 Free PMC article.
-
Longitudinal Pediatric Palliative Care: Quality of Life & Spiritual Struggle (FACE): design and methods.Contemp Clin Trials. 2012 Sep;33(5):1033-43. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2012.05.009. Epub 2012 Jun 1. Contemp Clin Trials. 2012. PMID: 22664645 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources