Efficacy of newer medications for treating depression in primary care patients
- PMID: 11059441
- DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9343(99)00316-2
Efficacy of newer medications for treating depression in primary care patients
Abstract
Purpose: Several medications have recently been introduced for the treatment of depression. We reviewed the literature to summarize their efficacy in the treatment of depression in adult patients in primary care settings.
Methods: We searched the literature published from 1980 to January 1998 using the Cochrane Collaboration Depression Anxiety and Neurosis Group's specialized registry of 8,451 clinical trials, references from trials and 46 pertinent meta-analyses, and consultation with experts. We included randomized controlled trials of at least 6 weeks' duration that measured clinical outcomes and compared one of 32 newer medications with another newer antidepressant, an older antidepressant, a placebo, or a psychosocial intervention for the treatment of depressed patients in primary care settings. The primary outcome was response rate, defined as the proportion of patients experiencing a 50% or greater improvement in depressive symptoms.
Results: There were 28 randomized controlled trials involving 5,940 adult primary care patients with major depression, depression requiring treatment, dysthymia, or mixed anxiety depression. Newer agents, including selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors, serotonin norepinephrine inhibitors, reversible inhibitors of monoamine oxidase, and dopamine antagonists, were usually compared with tricyclic agents. Average response rates were 63% for newer agents, 35% for placebo, and 60% for tricyclic agents. Newer agents were significantly more effective than placebo [risk ratio = 1.6; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.2 to 2.1), but similar to tricyclic agents (risk ratio = 1.0; 95% CI, 0.9 to 1.1). Response rates were similar in the different types of depressive disorders, except that two small trials in frail older patients showed no significant effects of newer agents compared with placebo. Dropout rates as a result of adverse effects were 8% with newer agents and 13% with tricyclic agents (P <0.05).
Conclusions: In primary care settings, newer antidepressants are more effective than placebo and have similar efficacy compared with tricyclic agents in the acute treatment of depression. Dropout rates as a result of adverse effects are lower with newer compared with tricyclic agents. Future studies should compare the effectiveness of different therapies among primary care patients with less severe depression and greater medical and psychiatric comorbidity.
Similar articles
-
Treatment of depression--newer pharmacotherapies.Psychopharmacol Bull. 1998;34(4):409-795. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1998. PMID: 10513454 Review.
-
Efficacy and tolerability of tricyclic antidepressants and SSRIs compared with placebo for treatment of depression in primary care: a meta-analysis.Ann Fam Med. 2005 Sep-Oct;3(5):449-56. doi: 10.1370/afm.349. Ann Fam Med. 2005. PMID: 16189062 Free PMC article.
-
Antidepressants for people with epilepsy and depression.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 16;4(4):CD010682. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010682.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 33860531 Free PMC article.
-
The efficacy, safety and tolerability of antidepressants in late life depression: a meta-analysis.J Affect Disord. 1997 Dec;46(3):191-217. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0327(97)00107-9. J Affect Disord. 1997. PMID: 9547117
-
Status of treatment of depression.South Med J. 1999 Sep;92(9):846-56. South Med J. 1999. PMID: 10498158 Review.
Cited by
-
The depression treatment cascade in primary care: a public health perspective.Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2012 Aug;14(4):328-35. doi: 10.1007/s11920-012-0274-y. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2012. PMID: 22580833 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[Developmental process of DGPPN quality indicators].Nervenarzt. 2013 Mar;84(3):350-65. doi: 10.1007/s00115-012-3705-4. Nervenarzt. 2013. PMID: 23494246 German.
-
The need for an iterative process for assessing economic outcomes associated with SSRIs.Pharmacoeconomics. 2000 Sep;18(3):205-14. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200018030-00001. Pharmacoeconomics. 2000. PMID: 11147388 Review.
-
A generalist's guide to treating patients with depression with an emphasis on using side effects to tailor antidepressant therapy.Mayo Clin Proc. 2010 Jun;85(6):538-50. doi: 10.4065/mcp.2009.0565. Epub 2010 Apr 29. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010. PMID: 20431115 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Describing the relationship between cat bites and human depression using data from an electronic health record.PLoS One. 2013 Aug 1;8(8):e70585. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070585. Print 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 23936453 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical