Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: characteristics of infants in the neonatal intensive care unit and well-baby nursery
- PMID: 11059699
- DOI: 10.1097/00003446-200010000-00005
Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: characteristics of infants in the neonatal intensive care unit and well-baby nursery
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study was to describe the demographic data, medical status, and incidence of risk factors for hearing impairment in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and well-baby populations in a multicenter prospective study designed to assess neonatal hearing impairment and to evaluate factors that might affect neonatal hearing test performance.
Design: This was a prospective multicenter study funded by the National Institutes of Health-National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders to evaluate the effectiveness of auditory brain stem response, transient evoked otoacoustic emissions, and distortion product otoacoustic emissions for newborn hearing screening. Research staff at each site obtained informed consent and detailed demographic and medical data, including information on established risk factors for hearing loss on 4478 high-risk infants cared for in the NICU, 2348 infants from the well-baby nurseries with no risk factor, and 353 infants from the well-baby nurseries with risk factors. For follow-up purposes the sample was divided further to include a subgroup called selects. Selects were either infants from the well-baby nursery who had an established risk factor for hearing impairment (N = 353) or did not pass the neonatal hearing screen protocol (N = 80). In this study, we focus on the distribution of infants by nursery and risk factors only. Particular effort was made to enroll infants with risk factors for hearing loss in both the NICU and well-baby nurseries. Descriptive analyses are used to describe characteristics of this sample.
Results: All 10 of the risk factors established by the Joint Committee on Infant Hearing in 1994 were identified in the NICU population. The four most common were ototoxic medications (44.4%), very low birth weight (17.8%), assisted ventilation > 5 days (16.4%), and low Apgar scores at 1 or 5 min (13.9%). In contrast, only six risk factors were present in the well-baby nurseries: family history (6.6%), craniofacial abnormalities (3.4%), low Apgar scores (2.8%), syndromes (0.5%), ototoxic medications (0.2%), and congenital infection (0.1%).
Conclusion: These descriptive risk factor data reflect both the newborn populations at the study sites and the bias for enrolling infants at risk for hearing loss. The high-risk NICU sample reflects the characteristics typically found in graduates of the NICU. The data summarized in this study will be used to assess the relationships between risk factor and hearing test outcome.
Similar articles
-
Newborn hearing screening: effectiveness, importance of high-risk factors, and characteristics of infants in the neonatal intensive care unit and well-baby nursery.Otol Neurotol. 2005 Nov;26(6):1186-90. doi: 10.1097/01.mao.0000184602.94677.41. Otol Neurotol. 2005. PMID: 16272939
-
The effects of hypoxia, premature birth, infection, ototoxic drugs, circulatory system and congenital disease on neonatal hearing loss.Auris Nasus Larynx. 2004 Dec;31(4):361-8. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2004.07.007. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2004. PMID: 15571908
-
Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: evaluation of transient evoked otoacoustic emission, distortion product otoacoustic emission, and auditory brain stem response test performance.Ear Hear. 2000 Oct;21(5):508-28. doi: 10.1097/00003446-200010000-00013. Ear Hear. 2000. PMID: 11059707
-
[The review of newborn hearing screening program in neonatal intensive care unit].Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Dec;29(23):2103-6. Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2015. PMID: 27101692 Review. Chinese.
-
Early identification of hearing impairment in infants and young children.NIH Consens Statement. 1993 Mar 1-3;11(1):1-24. NIH Consens Statement. 1993. PMID: 8401641 Review.
Cited by
-
Effects of ambient air pollution, fresh fruit and vegetable intakes as well as maternal psychosocial stress on the outcome of newborn otoacoustic emission hearing screening.BMC Pediatr. 2022 May 12;22(1):269. doi: 10.1186/s12887-022-03328-9. BMC Pediatr. 2022. PMID: 35549697 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of gentamicin and levels of ambient sound on hearing screening outcomes in the neonatal intensive care unit: A pilot study.Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Jun;97:42-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.03.025. Epub 2017 Mar 21. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2017. PMID: 28483249 Free PMC article.
-
Six year effectiveness of a population based two tier infant hearing screening programme.Arch Dis Child. 2002 Apr;86(4):245-50. doi: 10.1136/adc.86.4.245. Arch Dis Child. 2002. PMID: 11919095 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of the Brain Stem Auditory Evoked Potential Response among New Borns Post-Recovery after Hyper-Bilirubinemia: An Original Research.J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2023 Jul;15(Suppl 1):S268-S272. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_476_22. Epub 2023 Jul 5. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2023. PMID: 37654294 Free PMC article.
-
Gentamicin, genetic variation and deafness in preterm children.BMC Pediatr. 2014 Mar 5;14:66. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-14-66. BMC Pediatr. 2014. PMID: 24593698 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical