Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2000 Nov;38(11):4211-4.
doi: 10.1128/JCM.38.11.4211-4214.2000.

Comparison of intertypic antigenicity of Aino virus isolates by dot immunobinding assay using neutralizing monoclonal antibodies

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of intertypic antigenicity of Aino virus isolates by dot immunobinding assay using neutralizing monoclonal antibodies

K Yoshida et al. J Clin Microbiol. 2000 Nov.

Abstract

Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) against the Aino virus were prepared, and the neutralizing epitopes of the virus were defined by competitive binding assay. Seven continuous and overlapping neutralizing epitopes existed on the G1 glycoprotein of the Aino virus. Two antigenic domains were identified and were designated I and II, with domain II consisting of six epitopes. Dot immunobinding assays (DIAs) were performed with MAbs that recognized these seven neutralizing epitopes. DIAs were performed with 1 Australian strain and 21 isolates found in Japan between the years 1964 and 1995. The MAb response patterns of all isolates were divided into four groups. The Japanese isolates did not show large differences in antigenicity, but the antigenicity of the Australian strain collected in 1968 was significantly different from that of the Japanese strains; the Australian strain lacked reactivity to three epitopes and showed only low reactivity to one epitope.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1
FIG. 1
Proposed interrelationship of neutralizing epitopes of the Aino virus. The epitopes recognized by the MAbs (in parentheses) are shown.
FIG. 2
FIG. 2
DIA response patterns of the Aino virus isolates. The abscissa shows the degree of reaction against each MAb (corresponding epitope) as a percentage of the total MAb reactions. Representative strains of the Aino virus with the pattern are indicated in parentheses.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Beaty B J, Bishop D H L. Bunyavirus-vector interactions. Virus Res. 1988;10:289–302. - PubMed
    1. Calisher C H. Evolutionary significance of the taxonomic data regarding bunyaviruses of the family Bunyaviridae. Intervirology. 1988;29:268–276. - PubMed
    1. Coverdale O R, Cybinski D H, St. George T D. Congenital abnormalities in calves associated with Akabane virus and Aino virus. Aust Vet J. 1978;54:151–152. - PubMed
    1. Doherty R L. Arboviruses of Australia. Aust Vet J. 1972;48:172–180. - PubMed
    1. Egashira T, Itimaru H, Yoshinaga N, Enaga N, Utikoshi N, Minamikawa R. Abnormal birth of cattle suggesting an infection of Aino virus. Jpn J Vet Med Assoc. 1989;42:94–96. . (In Japanese with English summary.)

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources