Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2000 Nov;7(6):964-6.
doi: 10.1128/CDLI.7.6.964-966.2000.

Evaluation of antibodies against a rubella virus neutralizing domain for determination of immune status

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Evaluation of antibodies against a rubella virus neutralizing domain for determination of immune status

P Cordoba et al. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2000 Nov.

Abstract

The protective immune responses against rubella virus (RV) are related to its neutralizing epitopes, an issue that is important to consider when assessing the immune status of patients with remote infection. In the present paper, we compare the antibodies detected by a synthetic-peptide-based enzyme immunoassay (EIA) with antibodies detected by the traditional technique of hemagglutination inhibition (HIA) in patients with remote RV infection. The synthetic peptide used as an antigen (SP15) represents a neutralizing epitope that corresponds to amino acids 208 to 239 of the E1 glycoprotein. The SP15-EIA was developed, all variables that affected the assay were standardized, and the test was validated using reference sera. Serum samples (n = 129) from patients with remote RV infection were tested by HIA and SP15-EIA. Discrepant sera were assayed by MEIA (IMX/Abbot). The comparison between HIA and SP15-EIA, taking HIA as the standard methodology for determining immune status, showed that SP15-EIA is very specific and sensitive for detecting protecting antibodies (specificity, 100%; sensitivity, 98.20%). This study demonstrates that antibodies against the neutralizing domain represented by SP15 would be important in the memory response after natural infection and may be a good tool in the determination of the true immune status of patients with remote infection with regard to RV.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Best J M. Rubella vaccines: past, present and future. Epidemiol Infect. 1991;107:17–30. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control. Increase in rubella and congenital rubella. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1990;40:93–99. - PubMed
    1. Cordoba P, Nates S, Zapata M, Mahony J. Kinetics of specific IgM response in postnatal rubella infection by ion exchange chromatography-HAI. J Virol Methods. 1991;34:31–43. - PubMed
    1. Cordoba P, Grutadauria S, Cuffini C, Zapata M. Different affinity of monoclonal antibodies for conserved neutralizing epitopes on two strains of Rubella virus. Viral Immunol. 1997;10:103–110. - PubMed
    1. Cordoba P, Grutadauria S, Cuffini C, Zapata M. Presence of a neutralizing domain in an isolate of rubella virus in Cordoba, Argentina. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1997;4:493–495. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources