Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2000 Nov:(380):30-5.
doi: 10.1097/00003086-200011000-00005.

Prospective randomized clinical trial of continuous passive motion after total knee arthroplasty

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Prospective randomized clinical trial of continuous passive motion after total knee arthroplasty

S J MacDonald et al. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000 Nov.

Abstract

The authors report the results of a prospective randomized clinical trial using continuous passive motion after total knee arthroplasty. One hundred twenty patients were assigned randomly to one treatment group: No continuous passive motion (Group I), continuous passive motion from 0 degrees to 50 degrees and increased as tolerated (Group II), and continuous passive motion from 70 degrees to 110 degrees (Group III). The continuous passive motion was initiated in the recovery room and was maintained for a maximum of 24 hours at which point all patients began identical postoperative physiotherapy regimens. Patients were assessed preoperatively, during their hospital stay, at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 26 weeks, and 52 weeks after their surgery. There were no statistical differences between any of the treatment groups regarding cumulative analgesic requirements, range of motion at any measured interval, length of stay (Group I, 5.1 days; Group II, 5.2 days; Group III, 5 days) or Knee Society scores. The current study does not support the use of short-term continuous passive motion after total knee replacement. A standard and a high flexion continuous passive motion protocol failed to show any advantage over physiotherapy alone in the parameters evaluated.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types