Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor and multiple cycles of strongly myelosuppressive alkylator-based combination chemotherapy in children with neuroblastoma
- PMID: 11066054
Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor and multiple cycles of strongly myelosuppressive alkylator-based combination chemotherapy in children with neuroblastoma
Abstract
Background: The authors assessed key effects of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) used prophylactically with multiple cycles of strongly myelosuppressive alkylator-based combination chemotherapy. To the authors' knowledge, no large study has focused on G-CSF in this setting, yet this kind of treatment has recently become standard for poor risk pediatric solid tumors such as neuroblastoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS. Children with neuroblastoma received cyclophosphamide 140 mg/kg (i.e., 4200 mg/m(2)), doxorubicin 75 mg/m(2), and vincristine (CAV) in cycles 1, 2, 4, and 6 and cisplatin 200 mg/m(2) and etoposide 600 mg/m(2) (P/VP) in cycles 3, 5, and 7. To maximize dose intensity, chemotherapy was begun as soon as the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) was > or = 500/microL and platelet count was > or = 100,000/microL. No cytokines were used during 1990-1994 (control group; n = 28), but G-CSF was used from 1995 to 1998 (G-CSF group; n = 30) at 5 microg/kg/day subcutaneously from 1 day after chemotherapy until the ANC was > or = 500/microL on 2 successive days or was > or = 1000/microL.
Results: Each cycle of CAV decreased ANCs to < 200/microL in all 58 patients; recovery to 200/microL and to 500/microL was significantly sooner with G-CSF. In contrast, P/VP did not invariably cause severe neutropenia: similar numbers of patients in each group maintained ANCs > or = 200/microL and > or = 500/microL; recovery to 500/microL (but not to 200/microL) was significantly faster in the G-CSF group. G-CSF had no impact on rates of febrile episodes. Bacterial/fungal infections were slightly less frequent in the G-CSF group with CAV (P = 0.11) but not with P/VP. Dose intensity through cycle 4 was the same in both groups. Beginning with cycle 3, G-CSF patients had slower recovery to platelet counts > or = 100,000/microL. Response rates were similar in the two groups.
Conclusions: With multiple cycles of strongly myelosuppressive alkylator-based combination chemotherapy, prophylactic use of G-CSF hastened ANC recovery but did not reduce the incidence of febrile episodes, had little impact on infection rates, did not yield augmented dose intensity, was associated with prolonged thrombocytopenia, and had no effect on response rates of neuroblastoma. The data support more limited use of G-CSF.
Copyright 2000 American Cancer Society.
Similar articles
-
Randomized comparison of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus intensive chemotherapy for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and autologous transplantation in multiple myeloma.Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2004 Jun;10(6):395-404. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2004.02.001. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2004. PMID: 15148493 Clinical Trial.
-
Prospective, randomized trial of sequential interleukin-3 and granulocyte- or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor after standard-dose chemotherapy in cancer patients.Haematologica. 1999 Nov;84(11):1016-23. Haematologica. 1999. PMID: 10553163 Clinical Trial.
-
Combined use of erythropoietin and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor does not decrease blood transfusion requirements during induction therapy for high-risk neuroblastoma: a randomized controlled trial.J Clin Oncol. 2004 May 15;22(10):1886-93. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.01.002. J Clin Oncol. 2004. PMID: 15143081 Clinical Trial.
-
Hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors. Uses in combination with standard chemotherapeutic regimens and in support of dose intensification.Cancer. 1992 Aug 15;70(4 Suppl):913-20. Cancer. 1992. PMID: 1379115 Review.
-
[Bone marrow suppression--including guidelines for the appropriate use of G-CSF].Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2003 Jun;30(6):755-9. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2003. PMID: 12852340 Review. Japanese.
Cited by
-
Reduced risk of secondary leukemia with fewer cycles of dose-intensive induction chemotherapy in patients with neuroblastoma.Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2009 Jul;53(1):17-22. doi: 10.1002/pbc.21931. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2009. PMID: 19148951 Free PMC article.
-
Is high-risk neuroblastoma induction chemotherapy possible without G-CSF? A pilot study of safety and treatment delays in the absence of primary prophylactic hematopoietic growth factors.Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2020 Oct;67(10):e28417. doi: 10.1002/pbc.28417. Epub 2020 Jul 30. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2020. PMID: 32729196 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) prevents infectious death induced by chemotherapy in mice, while granulocyte-CSF does not.Jpn J Cancer Res. 2002 Apr;93(4):426-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2002.tb01274.x. Jpn J Cancer Res. 2002. PMID: 11985793 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Medical