Evaluation of the reliability and validity of a soccer-specific field test of repeated sprint ability
- PMID: 11072777
- DOI: 10.1007/s004210000246
Evaluation of the reliability and validity of a soccer-specific field test of repeated sprint ability
Abstract
The reliability and validity of a soccer-specific field test of repeated sprint ability was assessed. Seven male games players performed the repeated sprint test on six separate occasions. The temporal pattern of the mean sprint time was analysed by using coefficient of variation with confidence intervals (CI), and repeated measures ANOVA. A within subject mean coefficient of variation of 1.8% (95% CI, 1.5-2.4) was found for performance in the repeated sprint test across all six trials. The mean coefficient of variation across trials 2-4 was found to be 1.9% (95% CI, 1.3-3.1), compared to trials 4-6, where it was 1.4% (95% CI, 1.0-2.3). The ANOVA showed that a significant difference was present between the trials (F6,30 9.8. P<0.001). A Tukey post-hoc test showed that significant differences were present between trial I and trials 3-6, and trial 2 and trial 5. The learning effect was complete by trial 3. Performance in the repeated sprint test was compared to total running time averaged from two repeats of the maximal anaerobic running test laboratory protocol. Mean sprint time in the repeated sprint test and total running time in the laboratory protocol had a correlation coefficient of r = -0.298 (P = 0.516, n = 7), suggesting that the energetics of the two tests are not closely related. In conclusion, this soccer-specific field test demonstrated high reliability.
Similar articles
-
Validity and reliability of a new field test (Carminatti's test) for soccer players compared with laboratory-based measures.J Sports Sci. 2011 Dec;29(15):1621-8. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2011.609179. Epub 2011 Nov 21. J Sports Sci. 2011. PMID: 22098562
-
The development of a test of repeated-sprint ability for elite women's soccer players.J Strength Cond Res. 2010 May;24(5):1191-4. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181d1568c. J Strength Cond Res. 2010. PMID: 20386127
-
Is repeated-sprint ability of soccer players predictable from field-based or laboratory physiological tests?J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2011 Mar;51(1):18-25. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2011. PMID: 21297559
-
Validity and reliability of speed tests used in soccer: A systematic review.PLoS One. 2019 Aug 14;14(8):e0220982. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220982. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 31412057 Free PMC article.
-
Determining the reliability and usability of change of direction speed tests in adolescent female soccer players: a systematic review.J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2020 May;60(5):720-732. doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.20.10178-6. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2020. PMID: 32438788
Cited by
-
A brief review of strength and ballistic assessment methodologies in sport.Sports Med. 2014 May;44(5):603-23. doi: 10.1007/s40279-014-0145-2. Sports Med. 2014. PMID: 24497158 Review.
-
Sprint and jump performances in highly trained young soccer players of different chronological age: Effects of linear VS. CHANGE-OF-DIRECTION sprint training.J Exerc Sci Fit. 2021 Apr;19(2):81-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jesf.2020.10.003. Epub 2020 Nov 13. J Exerc Sci Fit. 2021. PMID: 33335554 Free PMC article.
-
Validity and reliability of a repeated multi-changes of direction agility test in senior soccer players.PeerJ. 2024 Jan 19;12:e16753. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16753. eCollection 2024. PeerJ. 2024. PMID: 38259664 Free PMC article.
-
The influence of aerobic power on repeated anaerobic exercise in junior soccer players.J Hum Kinet. 2011 Jun;28:63-71. doi: 10.2478/v10078-011-0023-z. Epub 2011 Jul 4. J Hum Kinet. 2011. PMID: 23487409 Free PMC article.
-
Physiology of soccer: an update.Sports Med. 2005;35(6):501-36. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200535060-00004. Sports Med. 2005. PMID: 15974635 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical