Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2000 Nov;157(5):1453-8.
doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64783-9.

Differential role for competitive reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and intracellular cytokine staining as diagnostic tools for the assessment of intragraft cytokine profiles in rejecting and nonrejecting heart allografts

Affiliations

Differential role for competitive reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and intracellular cytokine staining as diagnostic tools for the assessment of intragraft cytokine profiles in rejecting and nonrejecting heart allografts

B M Spriewald et al. Am J Pathol. 2000 Nov.

Abstract

The early and reliable diagnosis of allograft rejection is a difficult task and the assessment of cytokine expression in the grafts can be a helpful parameter. We have compared competitive reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) with intracellular cytokine staining by flow cytometry as tools to measure cytokine expression in rejecting and nonrejecting murine cardiac allografts. Both techniques gave comparable results for cytokine expression in rejecting allografts and syngeneic controls. Grafts from mice pretreated with anti-CD4 antibody and donor-specific blood transfusion showed a marked reduction in cytokine expression, as assessed by competitive RT-PCR, even though a cellular infiltrate was present in the graft. In contrast, the cytokine production measured by intracellular cytokine staining of the isolated graft-infiltrating cells was high and exceeded even that of the rejecting allografts. We conclude that intracellular cytokine staining of graft-infiltrating leukocytes by flow cytometry does not necessarily reflect accurately the cytokine milieu in the graft. This technique might therefore have a limited clinical application in contrast to competitive RT-PCR for the differentiation between graft acceptance and graft rejection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Intracellular cytokine staining of graft-infiltrating cells isolated from syngeneic, untreated (rejecting), and YTA3.1+DST pretreated (nonrejecting) heart allografts 5 days after transplantation. Total number of graft-infiltrating cells (A) and graft-infiltrating T cells staining positive for CD4 (black bar) and CD8 (white bar) (B). Absolute number of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells staining positive for IFN-γ (C), IL-2 (D), IL-4 (E), and IL-10 (F). Numbers given are ×10 and represent the mean of three experiments ±SD. n.a., not applicable. The flow-cytometry data of one set of experiments are shown in (G). Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) for staining with anti-CD4 or anti-CD8 antibody is given on the x axis, and MFI for staining with anti-cytokine antibody or isotype control on the y axis, for which the percentages of positive cells are indicated.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Competitive RT-PCR analysis of cytokine gene expression in syngeneic, untreated (rejecting), and YTA3.1+DST pretreated (nonrejecting) heart allografts 5 days after transplantation. The expression of C-β, IFN-γ, IL-2, IL-4, and IL-10 (AE) is given in femtogram (fg) of the amount of co-amplified competitor construct. The numbers represent the mean of three experiments ±SD.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Competitive RT-PCR for the expression of C-β, IFN-γ, IL-2, IL-4, and IL-10 (AE) in graft-infiltrating cells isolated heart grafts transplanted into recipients pretreated with YTA3.1+DST, before (−, left bar) and after (+, right bar) restimulation with PMA/ionomycin. The result is given in femtogram (fg) of the amount of co-amplified competitor construct. The numbers represent the mean of three experiments ±SD.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Basadonna GP, Matas AJ, Gillingham KJ, Payne WD, Dunn DL, Sutherland DE, et al: Early versus late acute renal allograft rejection: impact on chronic rejection. Transplantation 1993, 55:993-995 - PubMed
    1. d’Ardenne AJ, Dunnill MS, Thompson JF, McWhinnie D, Wood RF, Morris PJ: Cyclosporin and renal graft histology. J Clin Pathol 1986, 39:145-151 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dallman MJ, Wood KJ, Morris PJ: Specific cytotoxic T cells are found in the nonrejected kidneys of blood-transfused rats. J Exp Med 1987, 165:566-571 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Forbes RD, Rowan RA, Billingham ME: Endocardial infiltrates in human heart transplants: a serial biopsy analysis comparing four immunosuppression protocols. Hum Pathol 1990, 21:850-855 - PubMed
    1. Suzuki J, Isobe M, Yamazaki S, Horie S, Okubo Y, Sekiguchi M: Sensitive diagnosis of cardiac allograft rejection by detection of cytokine transcription in situ. Cardiovasc Res 1998, 40:307-313 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms