Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2000 Mar-Apr;13(2):69-74.

Effects of a normothermic dressing on pressure ulcer healing

Affiliations
  • PMID: 11074989
Clinical Trial

Effects of a normothermic dressing on pressure ulcer healing

L C Kloth et al. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2000 Mar-Apr.

Abstract

Objective: To determine the effects of radiant heat applied through a semiocclusive dressing on periwound skin temperature and wound healing.

Design: Before-after trial.

Setting: Spinal cord injury and geriatric units of a VA medical center.

Patients: Twenty inpatients with 21 Stage III and IV pressure ulcers.

Interventions: A semiocclusive, heated dressing was applied to 15 Stage III and IV pressure ulcers for 4.5 hours, Monday through Friday, for 4 consecutive weeks. The dressing emitted heat at 38.0 degrees C for 2 60-minute periods daily. At all other times, the wounds received only standard wound care. Six wounds in a separate control group received only standard wound care during the same 4-week period.

Main outcome measures: Periwound skin temperature within and adjacent to the dressing and measurements of wound surface area.

Main results: Mean skin temperatures inside and outside the heated dressing increased by 0.97 degree C and 1.08 degrees C (P < .05), respectively, from baseline values. Wounds treated with standard care plus the heated dressing underwent a statistically significant reduction in mean surface area of 60.73%. Wounds in the control group underwent a statistically insignificant reduction in mean surface area of 19.24%.

Conclusion: Wounds treated with a radiant heat dressing healed significantly faster than wounds that received only standard care. There were no adverse effects from the radiant heat dressing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources