[Should we always tell everything? About the difficulties to manage prognosis]
- PMID: 11076476
[Should we always tell everything? About the difficulties to manage prognosis]
Abstract
Patient autonomy should be respected when information is given about serious and life-threatening disease. The patient must be allowed to choose how much he or she wants to know concerning prognosis, and informed consent should be sought early on with regard to which level of autonomy the patient desires. A number of possible explanations as to why doctors conceal information from patients are discussed. Concealing information may damage the patient's trust in the physician. By not providing full information about a deadly disease, a physician may in turn be forced to bear the affliction of another's fears.
Similar articles
-
[The origin of informed consent].Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005. PMID: 16602332 Italian.
-
Why doctors should intervene.Hastings Cent Rep. 1982 Aug;12(4):14-7. Hastings Cent Rep. 1982. PMID: 7129619
-
[Physician's disclosure form a legal viewpoint].Diskussionsforum Med Ethik. 1991 Feb;(2):IX-X. Diskussionsforum Med Ethik. 1991. PMID: 2038829 German.
-
On advancing advance directives. Why should we believe the promise?Arch Intern Med. 1995 Nov 27;155(21):2271-3. Arch Intern Med. 1995. PMID: 7487250 Review. No abstract available.
-
Physicians in health care management: 7. The patient-physician partnership: changing roles and the desire for information.CMAJ. 1994 Jul 15;151(2):171-6. CMAJ. 1994. PMID: 8039062 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical