Review
[Responsible popular scientific information--what should be required?]
[Article in
Swedish]
Affiliations
- PMID: 11079327
Item in Clipboard
Review
[Responsible popular scientific information--what should be required?]
[Article in
Swedish]
Lakartidningen.
.
No abstract available
Similar articles
-
[Scientific reporting guidelines].Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2009 Nov 19;129(22):2340. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.09.1099. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2009. PMID: 19935931 Norwegian. No abstract available.
-
[Investigation of scientific fraud. Statements from the Swedish Research Council not sufficiently normative].Lakartidningen. 2006 Oct 25-31;103(43):3288-91. Lakartidningen. 2006. PMID: 17117661 Swedish. No abstract available.
-
Criticism preserves the vitality of science.Nat Biotechnol. 2002 Sep;20(9):867. doi: 10.1038/nbt0902-867. Nat Biotechnol. 2002. PMID: 12205496 No abstract available.
-
The art and science of reviewing manuscripts for orthopaedic journals: Part I. Defining the review.Instr Course Lect. 2004;53:679-88. Instr Course Lect. 2004. PMID: 15116658 Review.
-
New developments in the use of citation analysis in research evaluation.Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 2009 Jan-Feb;57(1):13-8. doi: 10.1007/s00005-009-0001-5. Epub 2009 Feb 14. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 2009. PMID: 19219533 Review.