Patterns of hypertension management in Italy: results of a pharmacoepidemiological survey on antihypertensive therapy. Scientific Committee of the Italian Pharmacoepidemiological Survey on Antihypertensive Therapy
- PMID: 11081785
- DOI: 10.1097/00004872-200018110-00023
Patterns of hypertension management in Italy: results of a pharmacoepidemiological survey on antihypertensive therapy. Scientific Committee of the Italian Pharmacoepidemiological Survey on Antihypertensive Therapy
Abstract
Objective: To collect statistically significant information on patterns of antihypertensive therapy in medical practice, with particular attention to the drugs used in the pharmacological management of hypertensive patients and the reasons for the limited achievement of therapeutic goals during treatment
Design: A survey conducted among general practitioners, specialists, and hypertensive patients.
Methods: A total of 28,000 physicians were contacted by letter and 3,394 declared their willingness to participate and received a questionnaire. Subsequently, 1,255 questionnaires suitable for analysis (corresponding to 37.0% of adhering physicians) were received. In addition, 4,612 questionnaires completed by patients were pooled and evaluated. The prevalence of hypertension was calculated from a base of 254,192 patients, seen by general practitioners.
Results: The prevalence of hypertension, defined as systolic blood pressure > or = 160 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure > or = 95 mmHg, or current treatment, was 19.7%. The average number of hypertensive patients in each general practitioner's file, covering the previous 12 months, was approximately 230. Physicians reported a 66% rate of discontinuation of treatment or switching to another drug. Physicians and patients both considered inadequate blood pressure control and side effects to be the two main reasons for switching antihypertensive therapy, but in opposite order. Furthermore, physicians indicated a prevalence of drug side effects between 10 and 20%, according to class of drug used, whereas 69% of patients reported to have experienced side effects. In the doctors' opinions, there were many reasons for poor patient adherence: complexity of the drug regimen, appearance of side effects, forgetfulness, reduced patient understanding of the need for long-term continuation of treatment, and refusal to accept a chronic pathological condition.
Conclusions: The survey showed awareness of the disease among physicians and provides a representation of the experiences of both general practitioners and specialists, in addition to that of their patients. During antihypertensive therapy, a disconcerting degree of discontinuation and switching of drugs occurred. Insufficient blood pressure control and side effects accounted for most of the observed treatment changes. This survey revealed the existence of a gap between the physicians' perception of tolerability and the real experience of patients, a clear need for greater tolerability of treatments, and a need for an enhancement of patient-physician communication.
Similar articles
-
Cross-sectional survey evaluating blood pressure control ACHIEVEment in hypertensive patients treated with multiple anti-hypertensive agents in Belgium and Luxembourg.PLoS One. 2018 Nov 1;13(11):e0206510. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206510. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 30383839 Free PMC article.
-
Control of hypertension in Italy: results of the "Study on Antihypertensive Treatment in General Practice (STAP)". Physicians Taking Part in STAP.G Ital Cardiol. 1998 Jul;28(7):760-6. G Ital Cardiol. 1998. PMID: 9773300 Clinical Trial.
-
Impact of hospitalization on blood pressure control in Italy: results from the Italian Group of Pharmacoepidemiology in the Elderly (GIFA).Pharmacotherapy. 2003 Feb;23(2):240-7. doi: 10.1592/phco.23.2.240.32087. Pharmacotherapy. 2003. PMID: 12587813
-
From the monitoring of severe to a survey of mild adverse effects of current antihypertensive therapy: the hidden side of the iceberg. The Scientific Committee of the Italian Pharmacoepidemiology Survey on Antihypertensive Therapy.Blood Press Suppl. 1997;1:40-1. Blood Press Suppl. 1997. PMID: 9285107 Review.
-
Blood pressure levels and control in Italy: comprehensive analysis of clinical data from 2000-2005 and 2005-2011 hypertension surveys.J Hum Hypertens. 2015 Nov;29(11):696-701. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2015.4. Epub 2015 Feb 12. J Hum Hypertens. 2015. PMID: 25673112 Review.
Cited by
-
Individualization of antihypertensive drug treatment.Diabetes Care. 2013 Aug;36 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S301-6. doi: 10.2337/dcS13-2013. Diabetes Care. 2013. PMID: 23882063 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Hypertensive patients' readiness to use of mobile phones and other information technological modes for improving their compliance to doctors' advice in Karachi.Pak J Med Sci. 2015 Jan-Feb;31(1):9-13. doi: 10.12669/pjms.311.5469. Pak J Med Sci. 2015. PMID: 25878606 Free PMC article.
-
Reasons for switching antihypertensive medication in general practice: a cross-sectional Czech nationwide survey.Medicine (Baltimore). 2014 Dec;93(27):e168. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000168. Medicine (Baltimore). 2014. PMID: 25501059 Free PMC article.
-
Estimating the impact of single pill combination therapy for hypertension: projections of patient outcomes in Italy.J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2023 Oct 1;24(10):714-720. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000001494. Epub 2023 Aug 7. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2023. PMID: 37577918 Free PMC article.
-
Financial and health costs of uncontrolled blood pressure in the United Kingdom.Pharmacoeconomics. 2003;21 Suppl 1:33-41. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200321001-00004. Pharmacoeconomics. 2003. PMID: 12648033
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous