Final results from 10 year cohort of patients undergoing surveillance for Barrett's oesophagus: observational study
- PMID: 11082084
- PMCID: PMC27527
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.321.7271.1252
Final results from 10 year cohort of patients undergoing surveillance for Barrett's oesophagus: observational study
Abstract
Objectives: To review the benefit of an endoscopic surveillance programme for patients with Barrett's oesophagus.
Design: Observational study.
Setting: University teaching hospital.
Participants: 409 patients in whom Barrett's oesophagus was identified during 1984-94; 143 were entered into the annual surveillance programme.
Main outcome measures: Development of dysplasia and cancer and mortality.
Results: The average period of surveillance was 4.4 years; 55 patients were reassessed in 1994 but only eight remained in the programme in 1999, withdrawal being due to death (not from carcinoma of the oesophagus), illness, or frailty. Five of the patients who entered surveillance developed carcinoma of the oesophagus. Only one cancer was identified as a result of a surveillance endoscopy, the others being detected during endoscopy to investigate altered symptoms. Of the 266 patients who were not suitable for surveillance, one died from oesophageal cancer and 103 from other causes. Surveillance has resulted in 745 endoscopies and about 3000 biopsy specimens.
Conclusion: The current surveillance strategy has limited value, and it may be appropriate to restrict surveillance to patients with additional risk factors such as stricture, ulcer, or long segment (>80 mm) Barrett's oesophagus.
Comment in
-
Barrett's oesophagus: the continuing conundrum.BMJ. 2000 Nov 18;321(7271):1238-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7271.1238. BMJ. 2000. PMID: 11082070 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Surveillance for Barrett's oesophagus. The conundrum of Barrett's oesophagus is changing.BMJ. 2001 May 5;322(7294):1124-5; author reply 1126. BMJ. 2001. PMID: 11360913 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Surveillance for Barrett's oesophagus. Appropriate practice must be studied.BMJ. 2001 May 5;322(7294):1125-6. BMJ. 2001. PMID: 11360914 No abstract available.
-
Surveillance for Barrett's oesophagus. It is too early to dismiss surveillance programmes.BMJ. 2001 May 5;322(7294):1125; author reply 1126. BMJ. 2001. PMID: 11360915 No abstract available.
-
Surveillance for Barrett's oesophagus. Patients need to be appropriately selected for follow up.BMJ. 2001 May 5;322(7294):1125; author reply 1126. BMJ. 2001. PMID: 11360916 No abstract available.
References
-
- Spechler SJ, Robbins AH, Rubins HB, Vincent ME, Heeren T, Doos WG, et al. Adenocarcinoma and Barrett's esophagus. An overrated risk? Gastroenterology. 1984;87:927–933. - PubMed
-
- Cameron AJ, Ott J, Payne WS. The incidence of adenocarcinoma in columnar lined (Barrett's) esophagus. N Engl J Med. 1985;313:857–859. - PubMed
-
- Spechler SJ, Goyal RK. The columnar-lined esophagus, intestinal metaplasia, and Norman Barrett. Gastroenterology. 1996;110:614–621. - PubMed
-
- Wilson JMG, Junger G. Principles and practice of screening for disease. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1968.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical